Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 July 21
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 20 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 22 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 21
[edit]01:13:13, 21 July 2022 review of draft by Mlebowit
[edit]I responded to the points made in yesterday's rejection by adding citations [not included originally], removing opinions and presenting information in a neutral voice. I submitted these changes and immediately was rejected before anyone could possibly have read the new text. Why? Mlebowit (talk) 01:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please read the comment, no Secondary source provided. Youtube and wikipedia are not reliable. QiuLiming1 (talk) 04:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
05:44:04, 21 July 2022 review of submission by Prashant321
[edit]- Prashant321 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Prashant321 (talk) 05:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear sir,
How can I come for the conclusion of the rule of an article content and the information source writing format,
Trombidium grandissimum species till has no data, yet completion can resolve the Indian Specimen data by adding the existing article, but I have tried to complete it via article discussion, let me know the procedure of adding the open link source journals or else how can this specimen recovered by red highlight? Please inform me "how to create an article in Wikipedia ?".
09:00:48, 21 July 2022 review of draft by VaternAU
[edit]I have removed all wikipedia sources but it still displays. After the sentence - WhiteBIT is a centralized European cryptocurrency exchange from Ukraine with over 3 million users worldwide. The exchange features over 450 trading pairs with popular cryptocurrencies, 30+ of which are pairs with national currencies (fiat pairs). The average daily trading volume is $1 billion.[1] you can see reference [1] that is Unian website and in refference list it is Unian as well. but hoovering the source [1] I can see wikipedia link that is not visible in edit mode, please advice how to remove it
VaternAU (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- VaternAU You have chosen to edit in a contentious topic area(crypto); there are special rules about this of which I have notified you of on your user talk page. If you work for this company or are otherwise associated with it, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing. Declaring paid editing is a Terms of Use requirement.
- Looking at your draft, you seem to have a common, fundamental misunderstanding as to what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place to merely tell about a topic and what it does. Any article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. "Significant coverage" goes beyond the reporting of the company's activities and goes in depth about its significance or influence. Sources like press releases, announcements of routine business activities, staff interviews, the company website, or other primary sources do not establish notability. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. I have added sources to governmental services that posted information about this company and also I have added many sourced of world's media that show how company helps Ukraine and sources that write about revolutionary things it invented. I understand that I am writing just 2nd article, but I have read all advice and still do not understand how to fix current issue with random wikipedia link that is not visible in the edit mode. Please, be so kind, advice me! VaternAU (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean when you say a link that is not visible in edit mode. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have removed all the wikipedia sources, they are absent in the references list, but hoovering the mouse on [1] after the sencence "The WhiteBIT ecosystem launched a new product, the Bitcoin Global peer-to-peer platform. Bitcoin Global allows users to exchange cryptocurrencies fee-free and with no verification." you can see the wikipedia link displayed in the left corner on the web page.And this link is not inserted in the article, that is why it is impossible to remove it, seems like it is a techical bug that I cannot solve from my side VaternAU (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have now checked other sourced in the text sources 7-13 are not displayed corectry after hoovering the mouse on the number of the source VaternAU (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have removed all the wikipedia sources, they are absent in the references list, but hoovering the mouse on [1] after the sencence "The WhiteBIT ecosystem launched a new product, the Bitcoin Global peer-to-peer platform. Bitcoin Global allows users to exchange cryptocurrencies fee-free and with no verification." you can see the wikipedia link displayed in the left corner on the web page.And this link is not inserted in the article, that is why it is impossible to remove it, seems like it is a techical bug that I cannot solve from my side VaternAU (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean when you say a link that is not visible in edit mode. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. I have added sources to governmental services that posted information about this company and also I have added many sourced of world's media that show how company helps Ukraine and sources that write about revolutionary things it invented. I understand that I am writing just 2nd article, but I have read all advice and still do not understand how to fix current issue with random wikipedia link that is not visible in the edit mode. Please, be so kind, advice me! VaternAU (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
09:46:02, 21 July 2022 review of submission by Josephnjata
[edit]- Josephnjata (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Josephnjata (talk) 09:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
I have cited these links and the person am creating and article about has a verified Facebook account with over 176,000 followers https://www.facebook.com/stycie/. I am not sure what exactly that I need to provide. Thanks
https://nairobinews.nation.africa/supa-modo-stycie-waweru/ https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/magazines/full-woman/meet-stycie-waweru-the-voice-behind-africa-s-newest-child-superhero-on-netflix-3604018 https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/daily-dispatch/20211002/281694027941457
https://www.dohafilminstitute.com/videos/meet-the-talent-stycie-waweru-supa-modo https://www.breakingkenyanews.com/2021/10/kenyan-netflix-teen-star-who-is-voice.html
- Having a verified Facebook account with over 176,000 followers confers zero notability. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
15:11:13, 21 July 2022 review of draft by Flow235
[edit]I'm new here and I wanted to publish my first article. Well I submitted it a bit too fast and it got declined. Now I need help and advices.
First, with choosing the right references. I have a list URLs as references but I doubt they will be accepted as reliable, e.g. can company's (Penat) own websites or blogs be used as references? Second, the text is not from me only, so I am "just" responsible for publishing the article. Is this still the category marketing/ pr or paid writing? If yes, how do I mark this? And the last thing, I need a feedback to the part about the product because I'm not sure if it's too much like an advert. Thanks :) --Flow235 (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Lydia
Flow235 (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Flow235 First, as you seem to be an employee of the company, you are indeed a paid editor and must make the Terms of Use required paid editing disclosure. This is mandatory.
- Any article about your company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about your company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Wikipedia is not interested in what a company says about itself, only in what others completely unconnected with the company choose on their own to say about it. So no, the company website, press releases, announcements of routine business activities and the like are not acceptable for establishing notability. You will also need to review how to make proper citations of your references. To be successful, you would need to set aside everything you know about your company and all materials its puts out- and only write based on what others chose on their own to say about your company. That is usually very difficult for those in your position to do, but it is not impossible. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
19:05:37, 21 July 2022 review of draft by Jeanne Angerie
[edit]
Hello,
I tried to put new sources in my article. I don't know if that matches your expectations.
Sincerely, Jeanne Angerie
Jeanne Angerie (talk) 19:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jeanne Angerie Your draft still contains many citation errors, and the sources should met our general notability guideline. QiuLiming1 (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)