Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 January 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 18 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 20 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 19

[edit]

00:33:26, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Muamalq

[edit]

Hello, I wrote an article about this person because he is considered one of the talented people in Iraq, and he is old In all the Spanish conferences in the name of Iraq He has many sources Muamalq (talk) 00:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03:35:40, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Hgizemtas

[edit]

Why my article was declined? What can I do to make it published? Hgizemtas (talk) 03:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hgizemtas: One source - especially a source from the subject themselves - is not enough to demonstrate notability as Wikipedia defines it. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 05:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:48:16, 19 January 2022 review of submission by 122.186.82.18

[edit]


the Content is Not Promotional and not even any paid contribution.. Please check the Content again and do whatever changes are required to get this Publish.. My Concern behind the article is only that they are providing Diagnostic Services and reaching to Rural areas very fast along with CRS activities, So would be good to read on this Company.

122.186.82.18 (talk) 06:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are employed by the lab, you are a paid editor, you don't have to be specifically paid to edit. The draft was sourced to nothing but press release type stories, or announcements of the routine activities of the company. Wikipedia requires independent reliable sources with significant coverage that are unconnected with the subject and do not write based on what the company tells them or merely what it does. Because the sources did not do that, the draft was rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 08:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:12:33, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Shakirullahsahir

[edit]

We have TV channel to create wikipedia page for the reason of biography of our channel so this information will not use for illegal aim so please re-review and accept this,thank you Shakirullahsahir (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it is important for us to have our tv channel information in wikipedia for clients so please re-review and i have completed the all requirements for the page i don't know where is my mistake kindly you point that area where is mistake. Thank you Shakirullahsahir (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shakirullahsahir Wikipedia has no interest in helping your clients, as that is a promotional purpose. Our only interest is in summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about(in this case) a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Any other benefit is secondary and not our concern. As your draft was rejected, it will not be considered further. Please review the comments left by reviewers and the policies linked to in the message. 331dot (talk) 08:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:30:27, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Bahram2010

[edit]


Since I started to edit the UArchitects page on Wikipedia, and it was my first edition on Wiki, so I requested for a review. The reason is that i would like to expand people s knowledge at Dutch architectural offices, who deliver or have delivered meaningful works.

Bahram2010 (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant attempt to promote one company. Rejected in 2020 after several Declines. David notMD (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:31:02, 19 January 2022 review of draft by 43.248.153.213

[edit]


I'm a newbie and have no idea on how to rectify the errors for this draft. I really wish to publish a wikipedia page for this celeb. If you can advise in particular what is missing in this draft, I'll try my best to work on it.

The draft has been prepared by another user and I've no link with them. I'm a fan of Pratik Sehajpal and came across this draft while trying to create a page for him. It is very crucial for him to have it in this point in time. 43.248.153.213 (talk) 08:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no interest in how the presence of an article (not a mere "page") benefits a potential subject. There are, in fact, good reasons to not want an article. Our only interest is in summarizing independent reliable sources with significant coverage. Wikipedia articles cannot be used to source other Wikipedia articles per WP:CIRCULAR. The other sources merely tells what the person has done and do not demonstrate how they meet the notability criteria. Please see the messages left by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:00:01, 19 January 2022 review of submission by HYPER2011

[edit]


HYPER2011 (talk) 09:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please give a summary of the problem you are facing. Wiki Emoji | Emojiwiki Talk~~ 10:34, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:27:46, 19 January 2022 review of draft by Leegiaphu17

[edit]


I have created an article titled as "Samuel Hwang". It is at Draft:Samuel Hwang. The thing is I don't know if the article got rejected or not and how I can improve this article. Unlike other articles at User:"my user name"/sandbox/"article title" which I know why these articles got rejected, I have no clue about how to fix this article Draft:Samuel Hwang. Can someone help me? Leegiaphu17 (talk) 10:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Leegiaphu17: Your article is being rejected. Don't worry, you can always improve and submit the improved version. Wiki Emoji | Emojiwiki Talk~~ 10:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:46:10, 19 January 2022 review of draft by ReaElle

[edit]


How can I ask Wikipedia cracks for support so that a contribution makes it quickly to be published? Specifically, it is about the Collegium Helveticum, an Institute for Advanced Studies, whose draft has not yet been released. I'm not really experienced here and would be incredibly grateful for support from a professional who can finish the whole thing cleanly.

ReaElle (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ReaElle There is no way to ensure a speedy review. This is a volunteer project where people do what they can, when they can do it. Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? If you are associated with this organization, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on required formal disclosures. You may ask for assistance here. Your main problem is that your draft has no independent reliable sources with significant coverage to support its content. A Wikipedia article is not for merely telling about the existence of the subject and what it does. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage (not primary sources) have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. If no independent reliable sources give this organization significant coverage, it would not merit an article at this time; not every organization merits an article, even in the same field. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:46:44, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Leegiaphu17

[edit]

How do I know about the status of this article? How can I make this better? Leegiaphu17 (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Leegiaphu17: it had not been a day since you submitted the draft for publication. do wait a couple of days next time. I have declined and left comments in the draft on what's missing. – robertsky (talk) 02:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:44:07, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Open Browser Wiki

[edit]


Open Browser Wiki (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:15:27, 19 January 2022 review of submission by President Diary

[edit]


I wrote an article on Olumide Fayakin and I feedback that the submission is contray to the purpose of Wikipedia.

I need clarity on the purpose of Wikipedia.

President Diary (talk) 12:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do you mean by personal resume/CV and NOT what Wikipedia is for.

I want to write a biography for the said person, how do I go about it?

Thanks! President Diary (talk) 12:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft Draft:Olumide Fayakin has no sources, independent sources are what we base articles on. A Wikipedia article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about them, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. Theroadislong (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote the the article, please review. President Diary (talk) 13:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

President Diary Please edit this existing section of the page, instead of creating additional sections. Your draft was rejected and will not be considered any more. You are only wasting your time and that of others by pursuing this further. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:00:04, 19 January 2022 review of draft by Drej.miha.2021

[edit]


I have made changes to this article and the references. However the article was rejected even though the subject is supported by a writen work of the author as well as two encyclopedia entries. Why are these references not correct?


Drej.miha.2021 (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a book written by the article's subject "Velimir Brezovski' cannot be independent. Theroadislong (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:00:37, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Joffejs

[edit]


Why was my page for Ricky Dale Harrington Jr. declined?

Joffejs (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure that Draft:Ricky Harrington Jr met the criteria at WP:NPOLITICIAN just being an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense. I figured he fell under "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage," since he was the first black

Senate candidate in Arkansas and the best-performing Libertarian candidate in a U.S. Senate election. Also the fact that he has been a notable candidate in two races (2020 Senate and 2022 Gubernatorial). Will defer to your judgment though Joffejs (talk) 19:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to re-submit, I'll leave it to another reviewer, I could well be wrong and you could well be right! Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Thanks for your edits Joffejs (talk) 19:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong, I declined it for failing WP:GNG. I did not feel it was proven through the sources cited that he experienced significant press coverage. However, if at least 3 sources that pass WP:RS can be found, I will gladly accept. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:44:12, 19 January 2022 review of draft by Chiulander

[edit]


Looking for extra clarity on the reviewer comments. I've read through the guidelines on citations and notability. Am I understanding correctly that for organizations, I'd need to have some veritable 3rd party source do a write up of Malecare in order for me to have an acceptable citation? This would *exclude* articles that quote the founder or more "human" pieces that describe a patient's personal experience, right? Chiulander (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chiulander If you enlist a third party to write about Malecare, it is no longer a third party, but someone you have asked to help you. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the (in this case) organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Those reliable sources should write about the organization not based on any materials put out by the organization or requests from its members/staff.
If you work for this organization, please review the information I placed on your user talk page regarding paid editing; also review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 21:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the author was asking about third party media coverage, not a Wikipedia writer. I did a quick Google search and couldn't find additional coverage. Might be WP:TOOSOON. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:42:32, 19 January 2022 review of submission by Masry684

[edit]

Hello, I’m asking what is needed for this article to be approved. Kindly note that the film is important and well known to Egyptian audience. Thanks for understanding. Masry684 (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Masry684 There is nothing that you can do, as rejection means that the draft cannot be resubmitted. No amount of editing can confer notability. Please review the comments left by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_January_19&oldid=1067773441"