Help desk
< January 13	<< Dec \| January \| Feb >>	January 15 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

January 14

08:18:58, 14 January 2022 review of submission by Nanou

Nanou (talk · contribs)

Hello, I'm wondering why the submission has been so many declined. I have many times little correction on that, according to your request. For instance: As reliable source, I have put the reference - inline citations of "VOGUE JAPAN", "Deutsches Theater which is famous national theater in Germany","headheritage.co.uk by Julian Cope in UK", I would say it's properly proofed.

Could you kindly let me know what should I so further? i.e. I should use title "Satoshi Okamoto" instead of "sub-tle." (which is his solo project name) etc.

Nanou (talk) 08:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nanou, Is the article about a project or a performer? On sourcing, I haven't looked too deeply but the few links I did click look like passing mentions. Subject could be notable but would be best served by a short article with 3 quality in-depth independent references so a reviewer can more easily see notability. If you think there are three sources that clearly establish notability, include them as a comment or on the talk page of the draft.Slywriter (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:49:10, 14 January 2022 review of submission by Pryi1499

Pryi1499 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Pune (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please guide me as to how can I improve the draft Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Pune for acceptance. Pryi1499 (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pryi1499 You can't, rejection means it cannot be improved sufficiently. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. 331dot (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Am I correct that this business school's most notable alumni are claimed to be a model, a snooker player and an actor, and that the assertion that these people are alumni remains unreferenced? If I am seeing things right, this draft has fatal flaws. Cullen328 (talk) 02:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:28:38, 14 January 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 2405:201:E00C:6106:2098:6F1E:B96E:617E

2405:201:E00C:6106:2098:6F1E:B96E:617E (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Harshad Reddy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

2405:201:E00C:6106:2098:6F1E:B96E:617E (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Riding 126 kilometers on a bicycle is not a plausible claim of notability. Having notable relatives is not a plausible claim of notability. Your draft completely fails to make a compelling case that this person is notable. Cullen328 (talk) 02:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:56:01, 14 January 2022 review of draft by Metz2020

Metz2020 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mount Eden Vineyards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am being told that my references are not valid. It is unclear to me what the decision making process is because your protocols are not equitable. This is not the first time that this request has been denied. My understanding is that in the first request, the references used -linked back to the website of Mount Eden Vineyards- were not acceptable because they were listed on the site. Which is confusing because as I did my research for other California wineries listed on Wikipedia they used this same reference process. I on the other hand used the correct process in which sited the source from other websites. Since a source for a reference such as WineSpectator.com requires you to be a member to see the source you cannot actually see it, but it is housed on the wineries website but what I am told by Wiki from the last time I tried to get this published is that was not acceptable.

So how do I fix the reference issue and get this page published?

Metz2020 (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft was declined because company is not notable, the content is entirely promotional and copied and pasted from https://www.mounteden.com/ has been deleted multiple times before and should be salted to stop further attempts. Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metz2020, I disagree a little bit with Theroadislong because I think this winery might possibly be notable. I have written and expanded several winery articles. However, the current draft is fatally flawed because it contains extensive copyright violations which simply are not allowed on Wikipedia. The quality of the referencing is poor. Sources written by former employees of the winery are of almost no value. Passing mentions of the winery are of no value. Major sections of the draft are unreferenced and written in a promotional style. These are not minor problems. They are severe problems. I recommend that you read and study Your first article and start fresh. Find several published reliable independent sources that devote significant coverage to this winery. Figuratively "forget" everything that you know about the winery and everything that the winery says about itself on its website and in its press releases. Neutrally summarize what those reliable independent sources say, and do not include anything that is not verified by the cited sources. Then, you will have a fighting chance to have the article accepted. Cullen328 (talk) 01:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFCH nominated at MfD

Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/MediaWiki:Gadget-afchelper.js/core.js

This may be of interest to some. (If there is a better location for this, feel free to move)Slywriter (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]