Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 February 5
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < February 4 | << Jan | February | Mar >> | February 6 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
February 5
[edit]11:27:26, 5 February 2022 review of submission by Jomokhowa
[edit]
I am requesting how i can better improve the article. what i should delete. Thanks
Jomokhowa (talk) 11:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- The entire draft was deleted, as it was essentially a resume. An article should not just document the existence of a person and their accomplishments; it should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the person, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 13:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
16:54:49, 5 February 2022 review of submission by M.h.a1363
[edit]
M.h.a1363 (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Draft:Toomaj Danesh Behzadi is unsourced. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic. Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
18:08:56, 5 February 2022 review of submission by Kittensbykittens
[edit]Hi! I am a preservation professor and am trying to learn how to make wikipedia articles for historic buildings. I am totally new at this, so please forgive errors! I submitted this draft article on a building on the Tulane University campus as a first attempt. I included several references, including the Tulane official website, an architectural historian society's description of the building, information about the history from a book, and newspaper articles about a recent controversy. However, my draft was still declined requiring more resources.
I agree that additional resources from entirely independent parties would be preferable, however, for historic buildings this is rarely the case. I would love any suggestions on ways to submit pages for this type of subject, as I feel that, provided the information is public/the site or building is public (to an extent at least, such as a university building) that wikipedia would be a great way to both save and share this information.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. If the topic is the problem- I.e. it isn't considered significant enough or is just not what wikipedia is about- I understand.
Thank you!
Kittensbykittens (talk) 18:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
23:03:50, 5 February 2022 review of submission by 2600:1700:4083:20C0:D00B:5A68:8BFD:4F03
[edit]
New sources for this subject have been discovered.
2600:1700:4083:20C0:D00B:5A68:8BFD:4F03 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unless they're a lot better than the single-paragraph stories and attempts at generating hype that're currently cited, this dog ain't hunting. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)