Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 18 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 20 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 19

[edit]

04:53:38, 19 October 2021 review of draft by Tylermelnyk

[edit]


Jyoti Gondek was just elected Mayor of Calgary. Why am I being restricted from editing her page? This woman requires extensive editing to her wiki now that she is mayor elect. I was hoping to do that work but its being denied. What? Why? Tylermelnyk (talk) 04:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tylermelnyk The draft has been accepted. I do not understand why you state that you are being restricted from editing the page. As far as I can see you have all the rights to edit one would expect for an editor in good standing FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:18:48, 19 October 2021 review of submission by Scootbilly

[edit]

Requesting re-review. {{paid}} Scootbilly (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Scootbilly I have done this, and left a comment on the draft. As a paid editor you are held to a substantial standard and are expected to understand our policies precisely because you are paid. Please learn them and then yiou are welcome to write a brand new draft which complies. I see no reason to overturn the rejection of this draft. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:22:58, 19 October 2021 review of submission by Yogendra singh Samar

[edit]


Yogendra singh Samar (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answered below. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:33:08, 19 October 2021 review of submission by LeoRathu

[edit]


LeoRathu (talk) 07:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LeoRathu Your draft has been rejected. Wikipedia is not here for you to promote yourself. Please use social media instead FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 07:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:58:35, 19 October 2021 review of submission by Yogendra singh Samar

[edit]


Yogendra singh Samar (talk) 07:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yogendra singh Samar Your draft has been rejected. Wikipedia is not here for you to promote yourself. Please use social media instead FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:23:52, 19 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Bennair

[edit]


Thank you for the opportunity. I am new to this platform and the style of writing. I tried submitting a company page with language as neutral as possible but it still got rejected. I even used external media links but to no help. Will appreciate the assistance.


Bennair (talk) 09:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:54:57, 19 October 2021 review of draft by Riteshkumarbhanu

[edit]


Riteshkumarbhanu (talk) 09:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Riteshkumarbhanu You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for the opportunity. I am new to this platform and the style of writing this please help us to publish this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riteshkumarbhanu (talk • contribs) 10:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Riteshkumarbhanu Who is "us"? There should only be one person operating your account. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about a person and their accomplishments. An article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Writing a new article is the most challenging task to undertake on Wikipedia, and it's good to first gain experience by editing existing articles in areas that interest you, to get a feel for how Wikipedia operates and what is expected of article content. Using the new user tutorial and reading Your First Article helps as well.
If you have an association with this person, please review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:25:38, 19 October 2021 review of submission by Neelmohapatra

[edit]


Neelmohapatra (talk) 10:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi, This is an old university and its founder is Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. also We tried to post complete correct information which is independent. Then why this article has got this content disproved.

Neelmohapatra Please see your user talk page for important information. I would refer you to my comments on the draft, as well as those in the messages declining it. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about something or its offerings, but a place to summarize what independent reliable sources choose on their own to say about it. The sources offered do not seem to be independent. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded on the user page. When will this article be approved now? Neelmohapatra (talk) 10:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neelmohapatra For further comments, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. The draft will not be accepted until it does as I have mentioned previously, here and on the draft itself. 331dot (talk) 10:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I cant understand what are you saying? Neelmohapatra (talk) 10:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neelmohapatra You are creating a new section of this page with every edit you make; this is unnecessary. Please edit this existing section. If you are using the mobile version of Wikipedia or the app, these do not have full functionality and make it harder to do that- please use the full desktop version in a browser, even if on a phone or tablet. This will allow you to see the "edit" in the section header of this section or at the top of this page, so you can avoid creating additional sections.
Regarding the draft, please review the comments by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:14:53, 19 October 2021 review of submission by 2405:204:1290:84F0:0:0:D2:18A0

[edit]


2405:204:1290:84F0:0:0:D2:18A0 (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:37:35, 19 October 2021 review of submission by Robayet7

[edit]


Robayet7 (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robayet7 You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. You cannot resubmit it. 331dot (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:51:27, 19 October 2021 review of submission by Abm1994

[edit]

I have two references for Prashna page . Can you add and do something with the page https://www.mymovies.it/ondemand/uiff/movie/9721-prashna/ https://www.unicef.it/media/unicef-innocenti-film-festival-a-firenze-la-seconda-edizione-della-rassegna-di-ci/

Abm1994 (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:55:44, 19 October 2021 review of submission by ZX2006XZ

[edit]

The trailer for the new Diary of a Wimpy Kid movie just dropped today. Here's the link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKhCPUa-glo

ZX2006XZ (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That the trailer was released changes nothing- once the film is released, it will be notable. 331dot (talk) 15:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:19:45, 19 October 2021 review of draft by 00sClassicGamerFan

[edit]


My submission got rejected even though I have a source to back it up. Where can I write about it?

My submission got rejected even though there’s a reliable source to back it up. Is a book not a reliable source?

00sClassicGamerFan (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 00sClassicGamerFan. In Articles for creation parlance, the draft was declined, which allows improvement and re-submission, not rejected, which is final.
  • The topic requires multiple sources to demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in the encyclopedia as a stand alone article).
  • Whether a book is a reliable source depends on more than the fact that it's a book. Non-fiction books written by scholars and published by academic presses or major mainstream publishers are preferred. The authors of Top Gear Christmas are a film writer, novelist, and television producer known for their comedy work. The publisher, BBC Books, is a sister concern to the company that produced the television programme which is the main topic of the book, Top Gear. The purpose of the book is to promote the series, so it is not independent of it. Whether it would be a reliable source about Donko would depend on what it actually says about it and in what context, but it seems unlikely to be reliable.
  • Even if it is reliable, it may not contain significant enough coverage of Donko to count as a source that supports notability. It doesn't help if the game is mentioned in a single sentence or paragraph, but might be considered significant if there are several paragraphs or a whole page about the game.
--Worldbruce (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_October_19&oldid=1068790909"