Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 31 << May | June | Jul >> June 2 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 1

[edit]

00:23:57, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Cninzihni

[edit]

Hey there, ICICB Group page was told as promotional so i reviewed the page and support every information with sources as much as possible but this time page got deleted completely. Every sentence in that page can be proven with sources or documents. Is there a way to revive that page? and if not, may i learn which parts of the page got it deleted? Thank you. Cninzihni (talk) 00:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was rejected, not deleted- but that means that it will not be considered further and there is nothing you can do to change that at this time. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again, so if i make changes again to make it more suitable for Wikipedia and submit for review, it will be declined no matter what i do? Cninzihni (talk) 22:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ezequiel Matthysse

[edit]

Review and publish: Draft:Ezequiel Matthysse Emat20211 (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Emat20211[reply]

@Emat20211: Yesterday, you confirmed that you would stop making this kind of post to ask for preferential treatment of this draft. You have submitted the draft for review. It will be reviewed in due course. Either work on the draft to improve it further, or (even better) forget about the draft and edit other articles on Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 06:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As Bonadea already stated try as much as possible to be patient, it appears the article has been declined today, no worries, take your time, any more quick resubmissions may lead to an outright rejection of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:25:31, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Fayedfed

[edit]


Fayedfed (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:03:57, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Zoefoster

[edit]


Zoefoster (talk) 09:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:40:05, 1 June 2021 review of submission by TrisAdler

[edit]


Hello Wikipedians and editors, I want to re-publish my draft. I feel like my draft is suitable enough to become an article. I have changed many things that might be biased, I have cited more reliable and verifiable sources, and I have improved my draft more. Hopefully my draft can be accepted, thanks in advance. TrisAdler (talk) 12:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TrisAdler The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, and no amount of editing can change that. 331dot (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:30:05, 1 June 2021 review of draft by Monujboraik2001

[edit]


I made a Wikipedia Page in the name "Anju Panchi". Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anju_Panchi All required data is added. Reliable source is also added. Kindly, help me with the page.

Monujboraik2001 (talk) 13:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is never an acceptable source (No editorial oversight). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:40:43, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Perahenning-ntnu

[edit]


I don't understand why this page was rejected. The centre where I am working is conducting important research and this page was supposed to be a more comprehensive version in English compared to the Norwegian version that is already published: https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Por%C3%B8se_medier-laboratoriet English is the language used at the centre. Please advice me what can be done here to get the English version up also :-)

Perahenning-ntnu (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the fact you're a merc, we do not accept content that has been plagiarised or copied wholesale from another website. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:34:23, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Algonovi

[edit]


He is a wellknown Makeup Artist in India, who did 300+ Large Works.

His Short Bio.

Suresh Pisharody (born 16 July 1982) is an Indian Makeup Artist from Cochin, Kerala, best known for his National and International works for top commercial brands in the world. Since 2019, he has been making a significant mark in the Indian makeup world through his unmatched creativity and perfection in various genres of makeup from bridal makeover, commercial and film makeup to even Kathakali (an Indian dance form) makeup. He is well known for his apt and on-point makeup techniques in the Bollywood short film, 'COLA' which had been selected for CHICAGO South Asian Film Festival; DC South Asian Film Festival; Tasveer South Asian Film Festival; LIFI India Filmosav; World Fest, Lonavia; Lexus Short Films; and Jio Filmfare awards 2018.

He is eligible to be in Wiki as he did works for clients like facebook, drishyam for Amazon

Will submit more of his works upon request.

Algonovi (talk) 18:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That argument is a nonstarter. We do not recognise notability-by-association. No sources, no article, no debate. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:02:29, 1 June 2021 review of draft by Carostar7

[edit]


Hello there Can someone help me? I would like to add a picture and a video for this new article but i wouldnt let me as it says filename is not allowed. Thanks Carostar7 (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You'd be rearranging the deck chairs on the sinking Titanic. No sources, no article, no debate. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:17:38, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Barouy13

[edit]


I have cleaned up the article to remove all promotional jargon. Barouy13 (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barouy13 The draft was rejected, and will not be considered further, despite your resubmission. 331dot (talk) 21:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:17:55, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Yossi1114

[edit]


StylishNoob has been collaborating with bunch of overseas streamers and professional esports player, recording the average of over 28,000 viewers. He made a new all-time-high viewer record of himself last month with 81,298 viewers. He absolutely deserves to be written on Wikipedia.

Yossi1114 (talk) 21:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of that suggests any notability though? Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yossi1114 (ec) The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 81,000 viewers is not that many in the grand scheme of things, but their viewership is not relevant, what matters is significant coverage in independent reliable sources, which this person does not have. 331dot (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:41:37, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Benjiedev

[edit]

I may not be famous but I have recently won an award and been nominated for other awards for my work in filmmaking. I have dedicated years to writing books and poetry. It just seems unfair that because I’m not famous, I don’t get a page on Wikipedia. Why? Despite all my efforts as a creator, you deny me a simple page to show my filmography and published works but yet you will happily add some YouTuber Pratt instead!

Benjiedev (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Benjiedev: fame is only one small factor we take into consideration when reviewing drafts. You personal feelings also have no bearing on the review nor does the fact that any other article exists. You repeatedly ignored the advice given to you in the decline messages which guided you to provide secondary sourcing to establish a level of notability which is the standard for inclusion. We do not accept IMDb or self published such as books or press releases as sources to prove notability. The article needs to based what others have written and published in reliable sources. If no one has taken the time to do this somewhere else that isn’t connected to you, then maybe you do not currently qualify for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not the place to tell the world how great something is.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:00:48, 1 June 2021 review of submission by Wbeeman

[edit]

DRAFT: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohammad_B._Ghaffari DRAFT: Mohammad B. Ghaffari

Wbeeman (talk) 23:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I was quite shocked and taken aback to have an immediate rejection (after five minutes!) of my draft article on Mohammad B. Ghaffari. Mr. Ghaffari is acknowledged to be one of the world's greatest experts on Iranian ta'ziyeh, and a distinguished actor and director. There were a substantial number of external references to his work by distinguished authors and publications, such as The Drama Review and The New York Times. What more is needed in order to make this article acceptable? I wrote this because, as a theater researcher myself I have collaborated with Mr. Ghaffari, and am constantly having to provide his biography and references to other researchers because of the significance of his work. I would appreciate an answer and some feedback.

William O. Beeman Professor Emeritus University of Minnesota

Draft Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mohammad_B._Ghaffari

Your draft was NOT rejected it was declined, pushed back to you for improvement. You have a conflict of interest and some unsourced content which will need citing or removing, your own personal knowledge and opinions are not required. Theroadislong (talk) 07:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_June_1&oldid=1027265818"