Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 February 9
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < February 8 | << Jan | February | Mar >> | February 10 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
February 9
[edit]00:36:25, 9 February 2021 review of draft by 74.73.230.232
[edit]
So if I'm reading correctly you need to be "autoconfirmed" to move pages or else the button won't show up. So can someone who is autoconfirmed move Draft:Syncuari to Draft:Syncuaria, with the "a" at the end, just a dumb typo on my part.
74.73.230.232 (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
And move Draft talk:Syncuari to Draft talk:Syncuaria 74.73.230.232 (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Done --Worldbruce (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
01:21:42, 9 February 2021 review of draft by 74.73.230.232
[edit]Silly question, but I was going back through the referencing tutorial. Anyway I think I have the basic idea down now for the citation templates, but I'm pretty sure your supposed to delete the tutorial page, in this case Draft:Referencing sandbox/22014662 once your done with it, and I haven't the faintest idea how to do that, so if someone else could do it for me or explain how to do it myself in really basic terms that would be appreciated, but I have some IRL things to do for the next hour or two, and it might also be one of those things you need to be "autoconfirmed" for anyway. 74.73.230.232 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- @74.73.230.232: You can just leave it there (in which case someone will clean it up in 6 months) or you can simply put
{{db-g7}}(as it appears when viewing the page) on it, after which an admin will clean it up. One last thing, because IP's are possibly changing hands from time to time, you need to be registered to be able to get WP:AUTOCONFIRMED. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)- Well if it will eventually take care of itself I'll just leave it be then. I wasn't going to register because I edit once in a blue moon, but if some things are registered only then maybe I'll think it over. 74.73.230.232 (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Actually on second thought I will add the template you suggested to learn how it works. 74.73.230.232 (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
03:07:08, 9 February 2021 review of draft by Tj26447
[edit]
Tj26447 (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Tj26447 (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
04:45:25, 9 February 2021 review of submission by Esmaeili.nooshin
[edit]
Esmaeili.nooshin (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Courtesy link: Draft:Architecture, Culture, and Spirituality Forum. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
07:10:31, 9 February 2021 review of submission by Ethanflashboi1122
[edit]
Ethanflashboi1122 (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ethanflashboi1122: I am afraid that being known for good jokes is nowhere near for getting an article here. Wikipedia is not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
18:22:13, 9 February 2021 review of draft by Avanyu
[edit]
Avanyu (talk) 18:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand the reviewer's comment. S/he seems to think my edit is for a new article. It isn't. It's only a short addition to the Amendments section of the page on the US National Labor Relations Act. Currently, the section has two short paragraphs describing past attempts to amend the Act. My addition describes a current national campaign to amend it.
- @Avanyu: I am afraid that AfC is only for proposing new articles. Additions to existing articles can either be done directly by you (if you don't have a WP:COI - which is unlikely) or are handled via the article talkpage using the edit request meachanism. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Avanyu: If you're not comfortable adding the info yourself, or have a conflict of interest as Victor mentioned above, you can go to the article's talk page and add a link to your draft, and ask for help adding it to the article. Or perhaps it might make more sense at Misclassification of employees as independent contractors? In any case, I'd remove the Facebook sources and try to find independent third party media coverage of the initiative. Good luck. TechnoTalk (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
20:47:34, 9 February 2021 review of draft by CyncoLA
[edit]
Hi I am requesting help on how to change this article. One edit said that notability was proven, just needed to change the citations. The next said that the person wasn't notable. Please advise on how to move forward.
CyncoLA (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi CyncoLA. Don't draw too much encouragement from reviewer ThadeusOfNazereth's comment that "Mr. Jacoby may fulfill the notability guidelines". I wouldn't read that as saying notability has been proven. Jacoby sounds like a worthy individual, someone who has worked hard on worthwhile things, but that's not the same as having gained significant attention by the world at large (which is what makes one a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article). If you have a close connection to the subject, it may appear to you that they're notable, but not appear that way to uninvolved editors. I've left a more detailed comment on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Worldbruce, This is correct, and I should've phrased it differently to make that clear. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 02:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Verdant333 (talk · contribs)
help in realising this article.Innes has been mentioned in Edwin Morgans poetry collection Cathures and his work is in situ. Article can be edited down. Innes is notable as it is known that his woodcarving of Edwin Morgan helped to create Scots Maker position and Morgan as first Makar.