Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 December 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 13 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 14

[edit]

03:16:29, 14 December 2021 review of submission by 2603:8000:C001:C4C4:4956:A591:42DC:8BB5

[edit]


2603:8000:C001:C4C4:4956:A591:42DC:8BB5 (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help by contributing to the page of Miss Asia USA

This class of help is not available at this forum FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:24:42, 14 December 2021 review of submission by Zzz2497

[edit]

i wonder if i am going to create a english topic, can i cite chinese/japansese reference? for example: i am going to create "DOG" , but my references will be in difference language describing the "dog".

ty. Zzz2497 (talk) 03:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz2497. Non-English sources are permissible, but English-language sources are preferred when they're available and of equal quality and relevance. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:49:31, 14 December 2021 review of submission by 2603:8000:C001:C4C4:4956:A591:42DC:8BB5

[edit]

Hi, how you fix the number indent? Thanks 2603:8000:C001:C4C4:4956:A591:42DC:8BB5 (talk) 04:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:8000:C001:C4C4:4956:A591:42DC:8BB5: What do you mean by number indent? If it's the reference formatting, that's not a great format for them. You might want to take a look at Help:Referencing for beginners. Rusalkii (talk) 03:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:41:19, 14 December 2021 review of submission by 2409:4071:2315:4ABC:0:0:24CA:18B1

[edit]


2409:4071:2315:4ABC:0:0:24CA:18B1 (talk) 11:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:21:15, 14 December 2021 review of submission by Rubbyfem

[edit]


Rubbyfem (talk) 12:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This subject is a notable personality. Also all content were duly referenced. Kindly review and revert your decision to unpublish.

@Rubbyfem: Please take this up with the reviewer who rejected your draft

16:29:43, 14 December 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh

[edit]


Hello,

Could I please get some feedback on my drafts? Thank you very much.

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howdyfreshhhhh It is submitted for review. It will be reviewed. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your feedback. @TimTrent. Any suggestions as far as editing the pages go?

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howdyfreshhhhh There is no need to start a new section, Please simply edit the existing section.
I have not reviewed it, so I have no suggestions FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 22:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TimTrent Thank you. Are my references and formatting valid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howdyfreshhhhh (talkcontribs) 17:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Howdyfreshhhhh please compare them with this:
For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 18:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TimTrent Understood. Thank you for your help. I believe my Deep Joshi draft has what is required. Will need to find references for my Agam Pandit draft. What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howdyfreshhhhh (talkcontribs) 19:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:00:41, 14 December 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Alexandracusumano

[edit]


Hi! I updated the draft but haven't heard anything about it getting approved yet. Can I please get my draft re-approved asap? Thank you!

Alexandracusumano (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandracusumano You have not actually submitted it for review, you did not have the correct information to do so, I have fixed this so you can now submit it. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you declared a COI, if you work for or represent this person, you must make the stricter paid editing declaration. 331dot (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:35:00, 14 December 2021 review of draft by Engineersone88

[edit]


Engineersone88 (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is COMPLETELY 100% original work and wording. Why is 'Yitz' suggesting it is copy/past ?? It is very insulting and Yitz should not be a reviewer?

Yitz is quite correct, the text in that draft consists mainly of phrases and sentences copied from various other websites, sometimes with minimal changes in phrasing, but not enough to remove the copyright violations; that also explains the promotional tone of the draft. The slight rephrasings e.g. here have also led to some awkward expressions, such as when "Two of her most notable solo performances..." was changed to "Her two notable solo performances...", or to changes in meaning like "Eimear mixes the styles..." which was changed into "Eimear utilises the styles...". --bonadea contributions talk 21:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where can you go to dispute a reviewer comment? Engineersone88 (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to dispute that the draft was copy/pasted, please discuss that with the reviewer on the talk page of the draft, or with the reviewer directly on their user talk page. If you want outside comment, please ask here. If you have additional comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Engineersone88 I'm trying to give you some thoughts on your own talk page. Approaching midnight here where I am, but I'm happy to try to offer you some help when I am not asleep or otherwise occupied FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 23:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE: FaddleTalk to me You have been absolutely great. Thankyou for your advice. the only person who has helps so far. And not another slap on the face for no reason. Thankyou so much. Engineersone88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineersone88 (talkcontribs) 23:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]