Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 September 4
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 3 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 5 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 4
[edit]01:58:11, 4 September 2020 review of submission by Kaundeepak
[edit]- Kaundeepak (talk · contribs)
Kaundeepak (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
i am an indian
- Hi Kaundeepak, Wikipedia is not a social media site where people create profiles about themselves. It is an encyclopedia where articles are written about topics that are sufficiently notable. Your draft has been rejected as it isn't the type of thing that wikipedia hosts.Pi (Talk to me!) 02:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
03:59:09, 4 September 2020 review of draft by Sagar.6630
[edit]- Sagar.6630 (talk · contribs)
Sagar.6630 (talk) 03:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
03:59:41, 4 September 2020 review of submission by Sagar.6630
[edit]- Sagar.6630 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Sagar.6630 (talk) 03:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Sagar.6630, Wikipedia isn't a social media site where people can create profiles about themselves, it is an encyclopedia where articles are written about notable topics. Your draft has been rejected as it is not the type of thing Wikipedia hosts. Pi (Talk to me!) 04:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Review
[edit]Please could you review the below draft
Draft:Adeeb Ahamed (businessman)
The reviews in deletion review had asked to create a new separate draft and resubmit(Kuruvillac (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC))
- Kuruvillac I've fixed your link to a proper internal link(the whole web address is not necessary). You have submitted your draft for review, and a reviewer will look at it in due course, please be patient. Efforts to "jump the line" don't usually work. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
10:29:42, 4 September 2020 review of submission by Nirjhor1
[edit]Hello, I've removed any line that may seem promotional. Please advice me if I need to change any other line or remove any other line Nirjhor1 (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nirjhor1 Your draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further(even if not deleted). Please read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
12:36:51, 4 September 2020 review of submission by Kburke423
[edit]
Kburke423 (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
My submission of a bio for Walter Paul Blass was rejected on August 4 because it did not have proper footnoting. The article is footnoted, so I need to know what is improper/inadequate about the footnotes. Thank you!
108.45.183.111 (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Will A. Irwin
108.45.183.111 (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- @108.45.183.111: I have cleaned up the referencces quite a bit, and added a maintainance tag to the veryy top of the page. The "Personal life" section needs a source, as well as the first part of the "Career" section. If you need the same reference multiple times, you can use named references. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
16:31:16, 4 September 2020 review of submission by Johnperdro
[edit]- Johnperdro (talk · contribs)
Can you please let me know why the article is rejected?
Johnperdro (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Johnperdro Your draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. It was blatant advertising, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell about themselves and what they do; we are only interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 16:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Johnperdro I see you declared a COI, but if you are employed by this company, you must make the stricter paid editing declaration. 331dot (talk) 16:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello!
I'm trying to create an article about "Time Out Dolls". These things will sometimes pop up in flea markets and secondhand circles online, and they're usually met with a lot of confusion. So I want to create an article that could help explain things and clear said confusion.
While I can find a lot of content about them online, ranging from sewing patterns, to blog posts, to photos, I'm really struggling to find reliable, verifiable resources. What can I do now?
Maddielovescolours (talk) 20:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Maddielovescolours (talk) 20:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maddielovescolours If you cannot find independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the topic, it would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
21:12:13, 4 September 2020 review of submission by Kuchisakeonnanaughty
[edit]Please Don't Reject Me
Kuchisakeonnanaughty (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Request on 21:13:26, 4 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Kuchisakeonnanaughty
[edit]
But I Will Be Famous
Kuchisakeonnanaughty (talk) 21:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Notability requires verifiable evidence. The draft does not have such evidence and I don't believe such evidence exists. Username6892 21:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)