Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 September 19
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 18 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 20 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 19
[edit]04:13:11, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Shōten is best
[edit]
Please tell me how I can publish this page? (talk) 04:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Shōten is best. When you were welcomed on your talk page last year, the very first link you were given was to the help page Your first article. That page contains much information that is important for any article you start. Its initial paragraph tells you:
Before starting a new article, please review Wikipedia's notability requirements. In short, the topic of an article must have already been the subject of publication in reliable sources, such as books, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals and websites that meet the same requirements as reputable print-based sources. ... if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article.
- The draft doesn't cite any sources to show that the topic is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). It has external links to her employer/agent (not independent) and to a page on Anime New Network's encyclopedia (which, being user-generated, is not a reliable source). Without several good sources, the page will not be published.
- In the past 18 months, you've tried to create about ten articles, but none of them have been successful. You may wish to focus instead on improving existing articles, which is generally easier. If you aren't sure where to start, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
05:14:55, 19 September 2020 review of submission by 156.0.212.4
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- 156.0.212.4 (talk · contribs)
The current United Artists page has some inaccurate info (especially regarding United Artists Releasing and United Artists Digital Studios) and history header names that make no sense, so it needs to be rewritten with accurate info and headers inspired by this revision. Plus, I'm not Nate Speed. 156.0.212.4 (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
08:40:35, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Author Sanju
[edit]- Author Sanju (talk · contribs)
This article is about an organization which has been newspapers also. Author Sanju (talk) 08:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Author Sanju The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It was rejected because it is a blatant advertisement, full of promotional language. If you work for this organization, you must comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
09:52:59, 19 September 2020 review of submission by The world of modern music En
[edit]I submitted the draft for review a month ago. I am just wondering about the review progress and whether it is okay to move this page to public space. (I am not sure if I have the right to move it though) Thank you! The world of modern music En (talk) 09:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- The world of modern music En You did not submit it for review; I have added the appropriate information to allow you to do so. Unless you have a great deal of successful article creation experience, I would advise against moving it without a review. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
12:16:15, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Avnee Sarin
[edit]- Avnee Sarin (talk · contribs)
Avnee Sarin (talk) 12:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Your draft was rejected because it has no independent reliable sources with significant coverage to support its content. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about someone. A Wikipedia article should summarize only what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a subject, showing how (in this case) it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Theroadislong (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
12:20:27, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Avnee Sarin
[edit]- Avnee Sarin (talk · contribs)
Avnee Sarin (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
13:34:22, 19 September 2020 review of draft by Uyimwen1981
[edit]- Uyimwen1981 (talk · contribs)
Uyimwen1981 (talk) 13:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I need help on my article, i have made some changes on it and now requested help Uyimwen1981 (talk) 13:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
14:28:33, 19 September 2020 review of submission by 103.127.57.178
[edit]
103.127.57.178 (talk) 14:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
14:30:17, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Cinro Welson
[edit]- Cinro Welson (talk · contribs)
Cinro Welson (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
14:36:06, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Cinro Welson
[edit]- Cinro Welson (talk · contribs)
Cinro Welson (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- As previously explained there is absolutely nothing here to suggest that he is notable in Wikipedia terms, his own website, Facebook and Linkin.com are not reliable sources. What ever you have been paid, give it back, this will never be an acceptable article. Theroadislong (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
14:36:32, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Cinro Welson
[edit]- Cinro Welson (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Cinro Welson (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
18:13:45, 19 September 2020 review of submission by Harpaalsingh
[edit]- Harpaalsingh (talk · contribs)
Hello Team WikiPedia,
I have re-edited the content for the article "Draft:Anand_International_College_of_Engineering" to maintain the encyclopedia policy of WikiPedia. Also, I added some secondary resources for the article topic as external links. Kindly review the content once again and share your feedback or make it live if looks good to you.
Looking to hearing from you soon. Thanks in advance!
Harpaalsingh (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Harpaalsingh