Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 November 28
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 27 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 29 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 28
[edit]11:18:03, 28 November 2020 review of submission by 185.219.167.248
[edit]
185.219.167.248 (talk) 11:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Please let me know why this page rejected?
- The reasons for rejection are indicated at the top of that list article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
12:13:35, 28 November 2020 review of submission by Minhajur Rahman Taseen
[edit]
Minhajur Rahman Taseen (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Your draft was rejected, you will not improve your chances of acceptance by removing the rejection notice. Theroadislong (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
N0c2c1 (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
N0c2c1 (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)please don't delete!== 15:46:37, 28 November 2020 review of submission by N0c2c1 ==
N0c2c1 (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- @N0c2c1: this topic does not appear to meet WP:NPERSON. In addition, Wikipedia is not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. This draft cannot be verified without a search engine. Also, it currently suffers from excessive links. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
16:11:42, 28 November 2020 review of draft by 82.3.185.12
[edit]- 82.3.185.12 (talk · contribs)
My article was rejected, what can I do to get it improved and accepted? Oh, and is aceattorney.fandom.com a valid source? 82.3.185.12 (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
82.3.185.12 (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Your draft was declined not rejected, aceattorney.fandom.com is not a reliable source because it is user edited. Theroadislong (talk) 16:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- FYI: We had this same draft literally yesterday. While it hasn't been rejected yet, a google search back then didn't bring up something contributing notability. We also had a lengthely conversion with I assume the same Person as behind this IP about reliable sources. See above thread from yesterday (#16:30:18, 27 November 2020 review of draft by 82.3.185.12). Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- I know my draft was declined, that's why I want to know how to improve it & get it accepted. 82.3.185.12 (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- It's simple, in order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about Justine Tung in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. If there are no sources then we can’t have an article about them. Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Like this one? 82.3.185.12 (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Also, Google '(Redacted)' and you'll find loads of stuff 82.3.185.12 (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sigh...www.justinetung.com is her own website so is NOT independent. Theroadislong (talk)
- OK I think we're done here, googling "(Redacted)" brings up zero independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 18:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sigh...www.justinetung.com is her own website so is NOT independent. Theroadislong (talk)
- Also, Google '(Redacted)' and you'll find loads of stuff 82.3.185.12 (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Like this one? 82.3.185.12 (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- It's simple, in order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about Justine Tung in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. If there are no sources then we can’t have an article about them. Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- I know my draft was declined, that's why I want to know how to improve it & get it accepted. 82.3.185.12 (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- FYI: We had this same draft literally yesterday. While it hasn't been rejected yet, a google search back then didn't bring up something contributing notability. We also had a lengthely conversion with I assume the same Person as behind this IP about reliable sources. See above thread from yesterday (#16:30:18, 27 November 2020 review of draft by 82.3.185.12). Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
ZianSaal (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
So, I wanted it to be accepted, and I went back and edited it. I gave more information on brilliant moves and added another position on Sunday (Draft:Brilliant move). I will try and add more positions overtime. When can you accept it?
Sincerely,
Zikrain
- @ZianSaal: There is no guarantee that draft articles will be accepted, sorry, and there have been no substantive improvements since it was declined. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
20:04:36, 28 November 2020 review of submission by Rantaiqi
[edit]
Could you please provide the recommendation? Thanks.
Rantaiqi (talk) 20:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Rantaiqi Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 20:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
20:15:24, 28 November 2020 review of draft by Drhunterhamilton21
[edit]
I'm a new user to Wikipedia and don't understand much because I have Autism spectrum disorder. Can you please highlight the mistakes I made and tell me what needs to be cut out in order for the article to be published?
Drhunterhamilton21 (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- WP:CRIMINAL says... a person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article. So it's not a question of what needs to be cut out, it's a question of whether they are notable enough for an article. Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Drhunterhamilton21 Also, you refer to David Ware as a murderer, but the trial has not occured. WP:CRIMINAL indicates that the person should be counted as a suspect then. The article should probably be named something like 2020 Tulsa Oklahoma Police shooting (If it is notable enough).Naraht (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
23:44:15, 28 November 2020 review of submission by 89.205.138.145
[edit]{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Good day, My page 89.205.138.145 has not been approved. I would like to have advise in improving it or making it suitable for Wiki-norms. The content we want to host is consistent when it is in final form. It will probably wont get any longer then we currently requested for. I am new to Wiki! A.I.Cloud
- Hello IP editor. Your unreferenced draft seems to consist of some form of original research and is unacceptable for this encyclopedia. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:50, 28 November 2020 (UTC)