Help desk
< May 2	<< Apr \| May \| Jun >>	May 4 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

May 3

04:20:05, 3 May 2020 review of submission by Jadelsb1

Jadelsb1 (talk · contribs)

I AM WRITING AN ARTICLE ON GRIFFIN OSKAR AND DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY IT KEEPS GETTING DENIED. HE IS AN UP AND COMING MUSICIAN WHO WAS SIGNED BY REPUBLIC (A MAJOR LABEL), HAS RECENT SONG RELEASES AND KEEPS GETTING DENIED. Jadelsb1 (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jadelsb1, Please don't SHOUT, that is seen as rude. To the article in question, "up and coming" usually means not yet notable to us. Please show how this fellow meets some part of WP:NMUSICIAN, our guideline on music notability. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Wikipedia does not have articles on "up and coming" musicians, the musician must already have arrived, so to speak. 331dot (talk) 07:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have an article on that: see "Up and coming next big thing". --Orange Mike | Talk 14:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:38:14, 3 May 2020 review of draft by KevinNlc

KevinNlc (talk · contribs)
- Draft:New Life City Church (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I require help as I'm trying to write my first article and 'NO' it is not a 'Conflict of Interest', I don't work for them or have any close links. New Life City is a church which I'm writing about and they are pretty famous here. To start with writing articles I has thought they would be a good choice. if possible suggest me edits and help. KevinNlc (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KevinNlc, Well you haven't shown that the church is notable. You'll need reliable and independent sources that talk about the chruch. Also, the tone of the article is pretty informal. Phrases such as "way back" are not encyclopedic. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:02:57, 3 May 2020 review of submission by 37.111.43.38

37.111.43.38 (talk · contribs)

This subject clearly meets the WP:ACADEMIC. So please kindly review this BLP ASAP. Thanks

37.111.43.38 (talk) 06:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is in the review queue. Please be patient. It would be unfair for you to jump the queue CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:57:33, 3 May 2020 review of submission by Nyiminsan

Nyiminsan (talk · contribs)
- Draft:YangonThu Michelle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm very new for Wiki.

I made draft article about her because of her effort and contribution to local women's community. I don't make any promotional related in my article. Even the celebrities and social bloggers are on Wiki, my honest question is why can't she? She have a lot of media appearance, even she is Young Southeast Asia Leader Initiative's country lead, but I didn't mention in the article because the announcement is only source at social.

Please help me for correct, and help one reviewer who know Myanmar language.

Nyiminsan (talk) 06:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nyiminsan I would first suggest that if English is not your primary language, that you may feel more comfortable editing the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. Regarding your draft, it is good that this person does good work, but Wikipedia is not for telling the world about good work or good causes. A Wikipedia article must show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources how the person meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. The reviewer felt that this person did not. I cannot read the Myanmar language so I cannot evaluate the sources for myself, but if the person does meet Wikipedia's definition of notability, the sources and article text need to better indicate that. If you just want to tell the world about this person, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:20:59, 3 May 2020 review of submission by Charles Oliver Burns

Charles Oliver Burns (talk · contribs)
- User:Charles Oliver Burns/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Charles Oliver Burns (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the issues, please can you now approve the page.

Charles Oliver Burns Your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning that the reviewer felt there was little to no chance it can be improved enough to meet Wikipeda's standards of notability. No matter how well you write it, no amount of editing can confer notability on the subject. 331dot (talk) 07:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Oliver Burns (talk) 10:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page should not be rejected, The Apprentice is an international phenomenon and Charles is widely known in the UK, therefore the page is relevant and worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia.

Please do not create a new section for follow up comments, just edit the existing section. If what you say is true, then you need to demonstrate that because the draft doesn't currently. Please read Your first article for more information. 331dot (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the BBC source which is a primary source, none of your sources mention him? Nothing there to suggest any WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 11:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:02:36, 3 May 2020 review of submission by Ruthwyshogrod

Ruthwyshogrod (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Smadar Nehab (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I am requesting a re-review of this article. I have updated my user page disclosure to state that I am did create this page on behalf of a client. However, I also believe that the person the page is about - Smadar Nehab - fulfill's Wikipedia's noteworthy requirements, and has made significant contributions to the development of an Arab high tech sector in Israel and a shifting socioeconomic landscape in the Arab community. These, I feel, are entirely worthy of Wikipedia pages as they represent objective, significant change and shift in Israel. Now that I have disclosed that I am being compensated to write the page, I believe it does not violate Wikipedia's standards and that it should be re-reviewed.

Ruthwyshogrod (talk) 11:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is stuffed with promotional puffery, poorly sourced and basically just a CV. not a Wikipedia article Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:24:19, 3 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Georgeadelmoureed

Georgeadelmoureed (talk · contribs)
- Draft:George's conjecture (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sir did you check my proof in my youtube video well ?

Georgeadelmoureed (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for stuff you made up one day. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:25:22, 3 May 2020 review of submission by Kato Kei

Kato Kei (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Keiya Kato (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The information i had provided is upto date as per the reference from the Wikipedia, please let me know how i can make this Wikipedia page.

Kato Kei (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kato Kei, The article has been rejected which means it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not the place to post someone's resume. I recommend job boards or Linkedin. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:11:05, 3 May 2020 review of submission by 2A02:C7F:CA19:2F00:44CC:3B64:167E:C924

2A02:C7F:CA19:2F00:44CC:3B64:167E:C924 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Supreme Clan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

2A02:C7F:CA19:2F00:44CC:3B64:167E:C924 (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have a question? Sulfurboy (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]