Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 May 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 20 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 22 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 21

[edit]

00:42:58, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Greg c1988

[edit]


Hi, An article this week was released on savings.com.au on The Lottery Office and habits during covid-19. I have added a line in also stating the concerns of anti-gambling agencies, rightly-so. Therefore, an extra citation has been added. I have also removed the charity section as they weren't citations to back up facts, but just links to the foundation.

Curb Safe Charmer - is it possible to get an indication on where this article is lacking, I genuinely think it's so much more solid.

Greg c1988 (talk) 00:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Greg c1988: The additional reference is clearly attributed to Jaclyn Wood of The Lottery Office. This type of coverage does not help establish notability. See WP:ORGIND and WP:PRSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Greg c1988: InterGame is a trade publication. There is a presumption against the use of coverage in such sources to establish notability. Savings.com.au briefly quotes the company, it is not significant coverage of it. Calvinayre.com is a company press release, so not independent. Licensingnt.nt.gov.au and austgamingcouncil.org.au are directory-type listings, not significant coverage. The only two independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of the topic are The Australian and News.com.au, both from March 2019 and about the comapny's practice of "matching" overseas draws. They do not consistute sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time to justify a stand alone encyclopedia article about the company.
Rejection of a draft is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable, so volunteers do not intend to review it again. This is the fifth time that you've asked for reconsideration of the rejection:
  1. April 30, 2020
  2. May 1, 2020
  3. May 2, 2020
  4. May 14, 2020
  5. May 21, 2020
Five experienced Wikipedians have told you that you're wasting your time on this topic. Articles for Creation will not publish it. Your time is your business, but stop wasting other people's time. You are dangerously close to being blocked from editing for not listening to consensus and editing tendentiously.
If, as you say, you have no conflict of interest, then Articles for Creation is an optional process for you. If you want to gamble, you are free to write an article at The Lottery Office without submitting it here. But if the reviewers are correct, it would be deleted if you did so, and quite possibly salted to prevent any further pushing of an unwanted subject. You have received good advice about improving Lotteries in Australia instead. Take it, or move on. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:01:52, 21 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Hip matter

[edit]


I need help with getting this article published; it was declined due to issues with editing and references.


Hip matter (talk) 04:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:30:51, 21 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Sogand Kamranii

[edit]


Hello everyone , i create an article for Tina Akhondtabar but it was rejected ! please help me guys .

Sogand Kamranii (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sogand Kamranii. The draft was declined, not rejected, so there is some hope, but it's unlikely that anyone who monitors this help desk is fluent enough in Farsi to help you find the independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain the significant coverage of her that the draft needs to demonstrate notability. You might do better asking at WikiProject Iran or WikiProject Film. If you can't find high quality sources, this may not be the time for an English-language encyclopedia article about her. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:24:37, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Tbiw

[edit]


Tbiw (talk) 08:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC) I develop this article and it was rejected. Please advice me on how to make it approved.[reply]

08:48:20, 21 May 2020 review of draft by SaibalTito

[edit]


Kaushik Mitra is a well-known, if not notable, personality in Indian advertising and creative industry. A lot of the write-ups that have appeared on him are in traditional media, old magazines and advertising industry publications from before 2010. I will be happy to share scans of these articles, if that helps. Also, I have cited an article from source afaqs.com to talk about Kaushik's awards won at New York, London, Cannes Lions etc. This is in my last edit. Afaqs is Agency FAQs, a well-known, independent and credible site following the advertising industry for now 20 years. Are there any additional details you would like me to share to verify authenticity?

SaibalTito (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SaibalTito If you have independent reliable sources that give this person significant coverage(not just brief mentions, routine announcements, or an interview), please summarize them in the draft. The draft should not just tell about the person and what they do, it should summarize what others say about them. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:17:13, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Jongray404

[edit]


Jongray404 (talk) 09:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC) Why has this article not been accepted. I have included two outside resources directly referencing the company and additioanl websites that expalin the company's objectives. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.[reply]

Jongray404 Your draft was declined, meaning it will not be considered further as it has little to no chance of being improved enough to meet Wikipedia standards. It is not enough for sources to merely mention the company, you must have independent reliable sources that have chosen on their own to give the company significant coverage. There is no specific number, but three is usually considered to be sufficient. Those sources must indicate how the company meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. You should also be aware of special rules regarding editing about cryptocurrencies. If you are associated with this company, you must review WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:18:22, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Zwiki2020

[edit]


Cause this is not a promotional content for the brand Zwiki2020 (talk) 09:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]




11:03:22, 21 May 2020 review of submission by OnyxModsLLC

[edit]


Why was my article declined? My article name is CyberWare Hackers or simply CyberWare Hacktivist Group — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnyxModsLLC (talk • contribs) 11:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OnyxModsLLC. Draft:CyberWare Hacktivist Group was declined because you haven't made clear where you got your information. In the references section you've written "Twitter" and "BleepingComputer". Neither is specific enough to be verifiable. Moreover, Twitter is a primary source, and Bleeping Computer is user-generated, so not a reliable source. An article needs multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. See Help:Referencing for beginners for how to cite sources correctly. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:19:24, 21 May 2020 review of submission by TISTOS

[edit]

Hello, Please can you help me on what next to do to set up this information on wikipedia TISTOS (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TISTOS Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something. This is an encyclopedia, and as an encyclopedia Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources say about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability, in this case, the definition of a notable organization. If you are associated with this organization, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:21:23, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Deep230

[edit]


Deep230 (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC) Why my article is deleted every time it show that i am promoting a company product but i am creating myself biography page[reply]

Deep230 Wikipedia is not a place for telling the world about yourself, please see the autobiography policy. It is really not for merely telling about any subject, this is why your draft was deleted. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources say about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. It seems that you have a conflict of interest(please review). 331dot (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:21:53, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Ca economics

[edit]

I have added more evidence of citations of Jonas Hjort's work in media and academia. Please reconsider. Thank you Ca economics (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ca economics The draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning it won't be considered further and that there is little to no chance it can be improved enough to meet Wikipedia standards. As noted, it appears that this person does not meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable professor.
If your username indicates that you represent an economics department at the University of California, you need to change your username at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, and also read and comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:30:11, 21 May 2020 review of draft by LukeBower1982

[edit]


Robert Adam has authored 5 books on the subject of Architecture.

I request clarity on what reference I should be using to prove he wrote these books?

Luke Bower 12:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't require proof that he wrote them, it requires independent reliable sources that report on the books and him. Theroadislong (talk) 12:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:18:00, 21 May 2020 review of draft by ArborChamp

[edit]


Hello, I was told to merge this page with another page and resubmit. I just want to make sure that I did it right.ArborChamp (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArborChamp (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:30:17, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Jasveergill11

[edit]


Jasveergill11 (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:23:29, 21 May 2020 review of draft by GCSE SVC

[edit]


Thanks, would really appreciate any advice or assistance on getting this article approved or more specific feedback on the exact lines that are causing a rejection - the paragraph is just a summary of facts; additionally, was under the impression it was in the public domain as per Wikipedia's entry: A work of the United States government, as defined by the United States copyright law, is "a work prepared by an officer or employee" of the federal government "as part of that person's official duties."[1] In general, under section 105 of the Copyright Act,[2] such works are not entitled to domestic copyright protection under U.S. law and are therefore in the public domain. GCSE SVC (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:13:34, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Andrew Sanchez-Kane

[edit]

I would like to know, how may I see this article published on the web. Although it has been reviewed and accepted multiple times, I do not seem to find it online. I have tried tinkering with it, but no success whatsoever. Andrew Sanchez-Kane (talk) 17:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have created a number of versions of this draft Draft:Juan M. Glassford Stettner Draft:Juan Glassford and Draft:Juan Glassford Stettner and placed fake acceptance code on them. Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have redirected the other two draft titles to the main draft title. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:16:20, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Stefanvihar

[edit]

My article has been in under review for months and still not published. Please specify the exact changes which needed to made in order to help it publish fastor make it acceptable by wikipedia standards.

Stefanvihar (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stefanvihar It was rejected a week ago as contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, but there is another version of it here Draft:Prabhakar Singh which has not been submitted for review, I don't hold out much hope for that one either. Theroadislong (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:38:27, 21 May 2020 review of draft by Nycinuk

[edit]


Hi - still struggling to see why this article is being rejected. The language is not promotional. The claims are not exaggerated. The statements are backed up by mainstream reputable references. The development has notability. I am not being paid to post this article. Please advise!

Nycinuk (talk) 18:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so desperate to get this draft published? There are no deadlines here. Theroadislong (talk) 18:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:31:23, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Mrcoleprotocol522

[edit]

Updated article to include more relevant information and sources. Additionally, I have added more third-party source to confirm information in the article. Mrcoleprotocol522 (talk) 19:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mrcoleprotocol522, A fellow reviewer rejected the article as they deemed there is no shot of the subject meeting or notability guidelines. The sources added are not compelling. Since the article is rejected, it will not be considered further. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


20:22:16, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Johntommy988

[edit]

hey there, i resubmitted the article about Alexander Kalombe and i haven't hear back, if the article pass or it still have some to be fixed? Johntommy988 (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johntommy988, Your article was rejected which means it will not be considered further. As pointed out on the page, the subject fails WP:NFOOTY and it doesn't look like he'll be passing that guideline anytime soon. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:49:03, 21 May 2020 review of submission by Jainemark

[edit]


Jainemark (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jainemark, Did you have a question? Sulfurboy (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_May_21&oldid=985275979"