Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 March 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 14 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 16 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 15

[edit]

01:30:39, 15 March 2020 review of submission by 82.10.37.178

[edit]

I believe fusion cinemas need to be on Wikipedia as they are well known in the USA 82.10.37.178 (talk) 01:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


01:38:50, 15 March 2020 review of draft by Singingmaya

[edit]


I am having a hard time submitting the citations supporting this article. I have tested the page but I am afraid to resubmit and lose all the work. Please help. I read a lot of links to learn to attach the citations but even the online supporting material is not attaching. I apologize I am not very good at this. Can you please help? Thank you. Singingmaya

Singingmaya (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Singingmaya. As an example, I've added a reference to the first sentence of the body of the draft in this edit. After studying the example and Help:Referencing for beginners, see if you can add references for the remainder of the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:19:42, 15 March 2020 review of submission by 1.186.196.255

[edit]


Vedang is very popular digital marketer in india and his remarkable entry at age of 16 made him a national sensation. He is verified on many social media platforms, he deserve wikipedia page . 1.186.196.255 (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


06:16:15, 15 March 2020 review of submission by 1.186.196.255

[edit]

plz re review and tell what can be done, vedang sir is reputed marketer in india and ceo of million dollar venture.

1.186.196.255 (talk) 06:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


08:17:35, 15 March 2020 review of submission by Kadrong

[edit]

I understand that as a newcomer, it will be alittle difficult to establish a foothold. ApaxonHost is a newcomer on the market, the company doesn't have any history nor newsfeed about it. The reason for this article is to simple establish the brand and grow with that help. I also understand wikipedia is business and tend to look at bigger companies with citations/references etc. ApaxonHost doesnt have those luxury and the references are people behind ApaxonHost helping it grow. Currently, a search on google doesn't bring much, hence why me creating an article. Kadrong (talk) 08:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I am not sure if we are understanding each other here and it is based on that misunderstanding my article is being declined. I am writing about my company (Is that allowed?) and the links is about the people who are helping the company establish. I may be misinterpreting what wikipedia is about so please enlighten me. Can I write an article about my company or should there someone who write it that isn't affiliated with me? Kadrong (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kadrong. Writing about one's own company on Wikipedia is discouraged because it creates a conflict of interest. The disclosure requirements are especially strict if you have a financial stake in a topic. I've left more information about that on your talk page.
Furthermore, you misunderstand what Wikipedia is about. The encyclopedia's articles cover notable topics—those that have gained significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, as demonstrated by coverage in reliable sources. If a Google search doesn't return much, Wikipedia almost certainly should not have an article about the company. The encyclopedia may not be used to "establish the brand", grow it, or publicize the company in any way. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:10:00, 15 March 2020 review of submission by Iamfrzu07

[edit]

Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fan_Club is a supporting club of Kerala Blasters FC Like West Block Blues of Bengaluru FC. so please approve this article Iamfrzu07 (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Iamfrzu07. There is already enough information about Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club at Kerala Blasters FC#Support. Based on the draft, Wikipedia should not have a stand-alone article about the fan club, so the draft will not be accepted. Continuing to beg for it to be accepted, after it has been declined four times and finally rejected, could be interpreted as tendentious editing. Such behavior could lead to you being blocked from editing, something that I see has already happened to the original author of the draft and a sockpuppet. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:53:12, 15 March 2020 review of submission by Kadrong

[edit]


This is where I realised that we are not understanding each other and this gives the question on how many articles are declined due to this misunderstanding. The company ApaxonHost is owned by me. I am not getting or receiving any form of compensation to write this article nor is there any financial reward attached to the writing of this. ApaxonHost is my company and I own and operate it. My only reason for writing this article is for customers or users to see what the company is about on its history and any other information that would be required for trust. The companies I have link to are government companies that I have approached for for advise on the law etc. People Plus is geared towards helping people gain self employed through the government allowances. I simple highlighted those information so that users can see where we as a company grew from. So let me clarify that this article is not for financial contribution nor am I receiving any financial contribution to create it.

Kadrong (talk) 12:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kadrong: If you own the company, then you are in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use under policy Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. On top of that, neither you, nor anyone else, may use Wikipedia "for customers or users to see what the company is about on its history and any other information". If you want to tell people about your company, you should use your own website to do so. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Well I didn't know that seeing I see many companies business articles created on this platform. You can delete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kadrong (talk • contribs) 14:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:53:12, 15 March 2020 review of draft by Kadrong

[edit]


Kadrong (talk) 12:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:46:17, 15 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Anzar sheikh

[edit]


Hy I write a article on Md Anzaruddin On wikipedia. But its rejected why i can't understand that could you help me.

Anzar sheikh (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anzar sheikh. The topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). Unlike other platforms you may be familiar with, such as Facebook or LinkedIn, Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself or your friends. It is an encyclopedia, it summarizes what independent, reliable sources have written about topics that have attracted significant attention from the world at large and over time. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:59:49, 15 March 2020 review of submission by Music Matters MK

[edit]


Music Matters MK (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:03:57, 15 March 2020 review of submission by Music Matters MK

[edit]

Hello, my draft was rejected, and I would like to get detailed information why is that. It is the English version of Polish wikipedia article of Łukasz Konieczny (with one or two minor changes). Music Matters MK (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Music Matters MK, The reason has been quite clearly pointed out in the decline: The page does not meet the minimum standard for inline citations. All claims about a living person need to be backed with cites or the information needs to be removed. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:12:59, 15 March 2020 review of submission by Bpurkaple

[edit]


The page was rejected as a neologism. I have added more citations to show you that it is not a neologism and is used in medical literature substantially Bpurkaple (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bpurkaple, The article has been rejected which means it will not be considered further. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
sulfurboy Even with substantial edits? I was told that it could be published if the neologism issue was addressed.Bpurkaple (talk) 18:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:35:46, 15 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Oliver-Serwinski

[edit]


Why did my article about Mr. dude Phil get declined?? He is a YouTuber/Influencer/Streamer, with over 2,500 followers/subscribers/fans combined. He needs his own Wikipedia page so his fans could learn more about him. Oliver-Serwinski (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver-Serwinski "needs his own Wikipedia page so his fans could learn more about him" is a promotional purpose and not permitted on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not concerned with helping fans of "Mr. dude Phil" learn more about him. If he is a "YouTuber", he is perfectly capable of helping his fans himself. It doesn't matter if he has 25 fans, 2,500 fans, or 2.5 billion fans- there needs to be independent reliable sources with significant coverage of this person showing how he meets the Wikipedia definition of a notable person. Please read Your First Article to learn more about the process of creating an article and what is being looked for. 331dot (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:24:45, 15 March 2020 review of submission by 82.10.37.178

[edit]
I have added the Office from Google Maps which you will see if the current location in the Ref

82.10.37.178 (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid your draft has been rejected the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, you have zero independent reliable sources so notability cannot be established. Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:46:49, 15 March 2020 review of submission by 173.59.16.114

[edit]


Hello, I'd be so thankful for a mentor who could:

1. tell me straightforwardly whether I'm wasting my time with this article and should give up

2. or give me bold suggestions on how to make it Wiki friendly (other than to go and read tutorials, which I've been doing)

In essence, I'm inviting the red pen :)

Thank you very kindly!

173.59.16.114 (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't link to a draft. Further we're not here to "red pen" for you. Your article is you work, don't expect others to fix it for you. WP:BUILDER Sulfurboy (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's best to model your draft after an similar existing article section-wise so it doesn't read like an essay. Asking a specific WP:WikiProject about your topic in question rather than a general project such as this is going to be more beneficial. JTP (talk • contribs) 14:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Are you asking about Draft:Pharmacological studies on berberine? As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia summarizes what has been written in secondary sources. So if there are three review articles, published in reputable medical journals, about pharmacological studies of berberine, then Wikipedia could have an article about pharmacological studies of berberine. Wikipedia is not the place, however, to summarize primary source research articles. See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and Wikipedia:No original research for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks to all of you for the pointers. Will try to incorporate all of the advice. Blessings.173.59.16.114 (talk) 18:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_March_15&oldid=985275716"