Help desk
< July 10	<< Jun \| July \| Aug >>	July 12 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

July 11

05:06:55, 11 July 2020 review of submission by Dropsofjune

Dropsofjune (talk · contribs)
- User talk:Dropsofjune (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I cannot see the Submit for Review button. Dropsofjune (talk) 05:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dropsofjune. I've added to your draft a banner that includes a "Submit your draft for review!" button. Before you submit it I recommend that you read Your first article and study some of the materials, linked from the banner, about how to improve the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:52:23, 11 July 2020 review of draft by Sebi1990

Sebi1990 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:1975 Cupa României Final (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I created the "Draft:1975 Cupa României Final" and my submission was declined, the argument gave being: "Article has been create-protected due to multiple submissions by a now-blocked user."... I don't understand 1.It says that if I don't resolve this issue, the draft will not be accepted but what can I do to fix this problem? 2.For me it doesn't make any sense, if a bad user or a troll creates badly a page, that page will forever be banned for creation? I put five good sources and a match report, which is better than most Romanian Cup finals have, but I can't control what happened in the past with "those multiple submissions by a now-blocked user". 3.Let's say a young footballer's page is created by such a user, the page is deleted, but later the footballer becomes the best footballer in the world, he won't have a wikipedia page?

Sebi1990 (talk) 06:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sebi1990 I would suggest that you contact the reviewer directly to discuss your concerns. 331dot (talk) 11:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:41:50, 11 July 2020 review of submission by 199nah

199nah (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

I've created a wiki page for an artist 199nah, but I got rejected the talk page by an admin said the stuffs are 99% copied from internet . biography is same for the artist and everything else is not plagarized. please allow me to copy the biography cause the artist have same bio on all profiles and is the signature for the artist please allow me use the same official bio 199nah (talk) 11:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

199nah Wikipedia is not a place to host official bios. This is an encyclopedia, and as an encyclopedia Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about subjects that meet our special definition of notability; in this case, the definition of a notable musician. We are not interested in what a subject wants to say about themselves or in what their "official" bio is.

If you are attempting to write about yourself, please review the autobiography policy. If you aren't, you will need to change your username at Special:GlobalRenameRequest. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:41:02, 11 July 2020 review of draft by 49.145.243.89

49.145.243.89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Jaiden Animations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

49.145.243.89 (talk) 12:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No new sources or content have been added since this was decline on 1 July 2020. Resubmitting without addressing the comments of past reviewers only wastes the tiem of everyone involved. There need to be multiple published independent and reliable sources, each of which discusses the subject in some depth to demonstrate Notability. Please understand that if Jaiden Animations is not in fact notable, no amount of rewriting or of adding sources with trivial mentions can create notability. If you want to continue working on this, please find, and add to the article several such independent sources with significant coverage. This means not interviews with the subject, not press releases or stories based on them, not fan pages, not things from Jaiden Animations's close associates, and not brief passing mentions, even in reliable sources. Each source should include at least several paragraphs about Jaiden Animations. Pl erase then add a note to the talk pageDraft talk:Jaiden Animations identifying the three to five source you think best demonstrate notability. Asking a reviewer to go through thirty sources again is a bit much. Again, do not resubmit for re-review without working oin these issues. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 14:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the draft is now written from a specific point in time, writing of events in 2019 as being in the future. It should be up to date, and also written so that if accepted and not edited for 5-10 years, it would still make sense. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 14:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:16:04, 11 July 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA

SONGEZO SA (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tshego (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you please tell me what should i do if it's not good enough, because i did what they said it must do SONGEZO SA (talk) 18:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SONGEZO SA, The draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SONGEZO SA, As one recording has been certified gold, confirmed by a reliable source, this article fulfills WP:NMUSIC#Criteria for musicians and ensembles point 3. I have therefore accepted it, the views of Amkgp to the contrary notwithstanding. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]