Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 December 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 19 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 21 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 20

[edit]

12:19:00, 20 December 2020 review of submission by 70.31.210.40

[edit]

Please advise on any specific edits to ensure compliance. 70.31.210.40 (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 14:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, The content confirms to wikipedia standards and merits a serious review. Can anyone help in pointing out what needs to be edited? 70.31.210.40 (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing will help, and you will only waste your own time and that of others pursuing this further at this time. Please read the comments left by reviewers, and the pages they linked to. Please make further comment in this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 22:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot: I took a look at at the recent edits and checked the sources. Several meet WP:IS—The CBC, the Montreal Gazette, canadianart, and the Saskatoon StarPhoenex. Those publications all published full articles on Russell, which argues in favor of WP:Basic. Also, the owner of a prominent gallery and a former currator from the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts both consider his work significant. Galleries are also continuing to exhibit his work four years after his death. The full monograph cited (George E. Russell, Rétrospective) is in the Quebec State Library's collection and the author has a masters in art history from Université du Québec à Montréal. Those feel in favor of the first criteria of WP:Artist. I added a paragraph to the Donation and discovery subsection to help explain Russell's notability. Any thoughts? Bruce (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Brucehs I would bring this to the attention of the reviewer who rejected the draft; perhaps they rejected it without knowing this information. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
331dot Will do. Thx for the quick reply! Bruce (talk) 18:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:01:18, 20 December 2020 review of submission by 188.30.120.38

[edit]


188.30.120.38 (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC) Amanda Schull made a movie called Romance retreat 2019[reply]

This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. If you would like to start writing a new article, please use the Article wizard. If you have an idea for a new article, but would like to request that someone else write it, please see: Wikipedia:Requested articles. I hope this helps.
--Worldbruce (talk) 01:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:28:13, 20 December 2020 review of submission by Leonardo.futuro

[edit]

Hello, I think many people around the world would benefit from having accurate information about this children´s rights Organization called Find My Parent. Using an innovative approach to child abduction and parental alienation Find My Parent looks to reunite families and raise awareness about child abduction worldwide. Leonardo.futuro (talk) 17:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft User:Leonardo.futuro/sandbox is just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo.futuro You cannot use Wikipedia to tell the world about good causes or organizations. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:04:24, 20 December 2020 review of draft by Digital World space

[edit]


How can i improve my draft and make move to artical. Please suggest me.

Digital World space (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Digital World space You were given advice by the reviewers on your draft; please review it. You have no independent reliable sources with significant coverage to support the content of the draft. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:11:36, 20 December 2020 review of submission by Andygiles133

[edit]


Hi. I have a couple of questions: 1. How do I edit the reference dates? (They are incorrectly formatted.) I cannot see them in the source. 2. I'd like to have this article be also searchable by just "attik". There is currently another article named "attik', and I'd like to give people the disambiguation option if possible.

Thanks! /Andy

Andygiles133 (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]