Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 4
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 3 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 5 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 4
[edit]00:09:05, 4 November 2019 review of draft by Mritch999
[edit]
I need help formatting my sources.
Mritch999 (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- You're talking about Draft:John Manley Barnett. There's several problems. The one you mentioned here is the sources. You've got them all pre-formatted, with reference numbers embedded in the text. That means if anybody adds or deletes a reference in the future, all the references need to get re-numbered. That's not workable. Please see WP:CITE for how we do references.
- As for the images, you mentioned on my talk page that, According to the newspapers, there is no copyright on them. That's not plausible. You may not have found a copyright notice, but it's copyrighted. It's almost certain that every one of the images you've used is going to be deleted as a copyright violation. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
04:40:50, 4 November 2019 review of draft by GouravSWS
[edit]
GouravSWS (talk) 04:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- GouravSWS, This article needs better sources. The website of the subject is not suitable. You also need to prove that the organization is in fact notable. To do that, you will need coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. Also, the programs section should likely be removed. The admissions section and lead also are unsourced. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
06:45:04, 4 November 2019 review of submission by Anshu2818
[edit]
Anshu2818 (talk) 06:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Your draft has not been submitted, but it will be rejected if you do, because it is just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
10:36:06, 4 November 2019 review of submission by Cdsfd
[edit]Hi! The article has been re-done and new sources have been added that should qualify the topic as being sufficiently notable. Cdsfd (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Cdsfd, None of the sources discuss the subject with significant coverage. The topic seems unnotable. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
11:21:55, 4 November 2019 review of submission by Isara22
[edit]
Respected Wiki editors,
Thank you for all the insightful clarifications.
I have declared my connection to the company on my profile page, as I am a current full-time employee. I have modified the article by removing the list of services, to prevent the content from looking promotional. I have added a new reference to help the notability issue:
I hope all those can bring the page closer to being accepted.
Isara22 (talk) 11:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but no, the topic just isn't sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia yet. Theroadislong (talk) 11:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
12:06:44, 4 November 2019 review of submission by 193.161.89.106
[edit]
193.161.89.106 (talk) 12:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Kevindkarlsen The page seemed to be about a nonexistent person, or a non-notable person. Wikipedia does not have articles about everyone, only those who have received substantial coverage in media. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
12:46:13, 4 November 2019 review of draft by Junniest
[edit]
Junniest (talk) 12:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- You have not indicated which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. We don't use external links in the body of an article and content like "Their music is freely available on Bandcamp, and on music streaming services such as Spotify, Google Music and Apple Music." is totally inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
13:31:00, 4 November 2019 review of draft by Than sein aung
[edit]
Than sein aung (talk) 13:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Draft makes no sense at all and has not been submitted for review. Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
GLOBAL VIDYAJYOTI INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL, GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE review of draft by RR
[edit]
Rrarya6 (talk) 14:29, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Rrarya6: - as said by the reviewer, since it lacks any sources at all, it can't show notability. Have a look at referencing for beginners to see how to add references. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7641196/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cr15
Moushumi Mitra with a screen name Moushumi Moush is a Costume Designer in the Indian cinema .
Filmography Mango Dreams https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7641196/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cr15
Pratichaaya https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7641196/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cr15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moushumi Mitra (talk • contribs) 16:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Moushumi Mitra, IMDb is not a reliable source. And don't add sources here, add them into the article using the guide that Nosebagbear linked above.Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand why my article is being declined. It cites exclusively independent, reliable sources and reads very neutral.
Any specific feedback is appreciated.
TonyGonzalezTGI (talk) 18:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- TonyGonzalezTGI, You seem to have a conflict of interest with this article. I have left a note on your talk page regarding how to deal with that. In essence, you need to declare any conflicts of interest. You don't need to say "Oh I am Antonio" or "I know him", merely that you have a conflict of interest.
- Once you've done that, note that not all sources are up to snuff. IMDb is not a reliable source. Modern tire dealer, and tire review both seem like unreliable industry publications to me. The CEO corner bit is an interview, which is a primary source and not independent. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. I'm on the fence about whether Tire Business is reliable. A films own website should not be used to talk about itself. And since this is a biography of a living person, every claim should generally be sourced. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Need help for this. This is my personal page and I want to know why it is rejected?
[edit]18:23:32, 4 November 2019 review of submission by Thesecretorder
[edit]
tso 18:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Thesecretorder: Wikipedia is not a web host. We are not here to host folk's personal pages. Draft space and user space is still to used to imrpove the encyclopedia by creating articles about notable subjects that meet our policies. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
19:59:31, 4 November 2019 review of draft by CheatCodes4ever
[edit]
But I did put references on it! I don’t get the coding of references, but what I’ve got is good enough! Please understand me, I put references from the ARIA Charts. It failed, it wasn’t on the charts. I have got it! Don’t decline this page again! It’s good enough!
CheatCodes4ever (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- CheatCodes4ever, The reference does not show that the subject is notable, i.e. that it should be included on Wikipedia. The album did not top the charts, and there is no other reason provided why it would be notable. Also, you will need more than a single reference. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
20:05:48, 4 November 2019 review of submission by Cgandara2318
[edit]- Cgandara2318 (talk · contribs)
Can you tell me specifically what's wrong with the page??
Cgandara2318 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- As it says on your draft "Wikipedia is not intended as a how-to service". Theroadislong (talk) 22:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)