Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 18
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < January 17 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 19 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
January 18
[edit]07:08:22, 18 January 2019 review of submission by Kirtigup
[edit]
I need to publish this page without any flaws. Kindly help me.
Kirtigup (talk) 07:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Kirtigup: Please read WP:NACTOR, WP:NBIO and WP:NPOV. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
08:00:20, 18 January 2019 review of submission by 111.92.27.219
[edit]
Mr Abey George has been on the forefront of social causes in Kerala and has made notable contributions to the healthcare and sociual welfare causes. However he is deemed as not noteworthy, a comment, more that two hundred thousand benefactors and many more onlooker may have difficulty accepting. Kindly do advise how to make this article more note worthy, worthy enough to represent the person it is about.111.92.27.219 (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 111.92.27.219 (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @111.92.27.219: Please read WP:NBIO. However, I suggest that your draft is actually about Swasthi Foundation rather than Mr George, and should be renamed accordingly. If you do that, you'll need to show how the organisation meets the WP:NORG criteria. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
We do not understand why our page is not notable enough to be published. The page exists as is in French. Thank you to communicate the changes to us.
Verbierfestival (talk) 08:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Verbierfestival: You said 'our page' but it isn't your page. Please read WP:OWNERSHIP. Then please read WP:NMUSICBIO and WP:NBIO. The existence of an article about them in the French Wikipedia does not automatically mean that there should be an article about them in the English Wikipedia. They are separate projects and have different inclusion criteria. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
08:52:39, 18 January 2019 review of submission by BHJ15
[edit]
I've supported sources for the claims on the page, which were lacking before.BHJ 08:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC) BHJ 08:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Accepted per WP:GEOFEAT on the strength of the first two sources and the further reading. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Verbier Festival in an international festival of classical music. The public English-speaker represents 37%. 35% of their media coverage comes from abroad. Learning Programme are taught in English and all the print & web supports are translated. Furthermore, most artists who come at the festival speak English. So it is necessary to have these information in English. The English Wikipedia page for the Verbier Festival exists in English. We don’t understand why this page about the founder is not legitimate to exist too. Thank you for your consideration and your answer.
Verbierfestival (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Verbierfestival. All content added to Wikipedia must be verifiable in reliable, published sources. The draft cites no sources. Compounding that problem, you appear to have an undisclosed conflict of interest. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
17:36:44, 18 January 2019 review of submission by Accessexpertise
[edit]
- Article does meet WP:NCORP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)) - Has multiple sources, multiple reliable sources, is inherently notable due to its status as a unicorn, its role in the Armenia-US trade agreement, and its market share in both the US and Canada. Can you please advise me on why it is being rejected on these grounds, when as far as I can see it does meet the requirements.
Accessexpertise (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Accessexpertise. The draft does not meet WP:NCORP.
- TechCrunch fails WP:ORGIND. As Rhadow writes, "TechCrunch reprints every tech press release that comes across the transom". See RSN archive 221 and RSN archive 246, among many others.
- Bloomberg #1 is indiscriminate. It attempts to list every company, so it does not help demonstrate the notability of any.
- ACHRNEWS and Contractor are trade publications. As WP:ORGIND states, "there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to establish notability as businesses frequently make use of these publications to increase their visibility."
- Asbarez is a trivial mention.
- Crunchbase does not help demonstrate notability. Past discussions have noted a plethora of problems, including user-generated content (not a reliable source), not independent, primary source, and indiscriminate. See RSN archive 218 and RSN archive 252
- L. A. Biz and The Hustle are regurgitations of this press release, so not independent.
- The only independent, reliable, secondary source that contains significant coverage of ServiceTitan is Bloomberg #2. A single such source is not sufficient to demonstrate notability. You assert that it "is inherently notable due to its status as a unicorn, its role in the Armenia-US trade agreement, and its market share in both the US and Canada", but those things do not satisfy any of the notability criteria. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
22:32:39, 18 January 2019 review of draft by ImaKnug
[edit]
I am requesting help on this article because it is my first article. I can also see that it some parts of the article did not end up where I wanted them so, such as the content box and the infobox. I am also seeking a request to improve the article. ImaKnug (talk) 22:32, 18 January 2019 (UTC)