User talk:Accessexpertise

Welcome!

Hello, Accessexpertise, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was DeepBench, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GSS (talk|c|em) 16:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DeepBench

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello,

Thanks so much for your advice! It looks like the DeepBench article was reverted to draft form. Would you mind letting me know which aspects of the article read as promotional? I do not work for DeepBench or any partners of DeepBench, but am very interested in topics around the knowledge economy and the fragmentation of the workforce. I'm definitely not wed to keeping this particular article, but would like to learn from the experience so that I can publish other articles on topics and players in this space that I believe would be valuable to the Wikipedia community. If you think this company is not notable enough, I definitely understand and would simply like to learn for my next article. Thanks so much!

I don't see that the subject of the article meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. The company's main achievement so far seems to have been getting funded (with a rather small amount, as startups go). There's very little coverage in reliable third-party sources (Forbes Contributors, unlike Forbes' own staff, are effectively bloggers whose posts are not under Forbes' editorial control). If the company is notable, the draft needs better sources to clearly show that it is. Huon (talk) 12:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae

I'm a bit confused - the accusation was that I'm a paid editor for DeepBench, which I'm not, as evidenced by me not pursuing the article for publication. Could you please let me know how editors "prove" on wikipedia that they are not paid editors? I am unequivocally not paid any of the companies I have contributed to nor am I paid by either of the companies I tried to make pages for. Thanks in advance for any feedback!

Accessexpertise (talk) 19:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atheneum Partners (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mill coverage is not sufficient to meet notability criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atheneum Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Atheneum Partners, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Accessexpertise! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae Would you mind explaining why the coverage of the $10M in funding was insufficient for meeting the notability criteria? Thanks! Accessexpertise (talk) 19:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coleman Research Group moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Coleman Research Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

This is very poorly sourced to WP:MILL announcements and funding PR. Praxidicae (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae I was using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalant as an example for a company that reaches notability criteria but is not Amazon/Google/Facebook status. It looks like the sources I used are quite similar to those used for this article (Crunchbase, a press release, and then small mentions in major outlets) - could you help me understand the discrepancy? Accessexpertise (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coleman Research Group (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This doesn't appear to meet WP:NCORP. Being on a list of "best places to work" is not a suitable claim of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coleman Research Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coleman Research Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 20:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ServiceTitan moved to draftspace

For this to be an article, there needs to be information about things other than how much money they've raised. As is, this looks like a promotional business listing and I can't determine notability. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Natureium (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Natureium Thanks for the input. Can you clarify why you cannot determine notability? The company is valued at over $1B (making it one of only 260 "unicorns" in the world) and has had full length features in the biggest media outlets in the US (TechCrunch, Forbes, Bloomberg, etc.), so I'm a bit unclear as to why its notability would be questioned. Thanks a lot for any advice! Accessexpertise (talk) 17:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ServiceTitan (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are two references about the company which could show notability (Bloomberg and TechCrunch). The others are general announcements about funding which do not contribute towards WP:NCORP. As it stands, there is nothing to indicate why this company is worth of notice. The information about funding simply makes it look like an advert.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ServiceTitan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ServiceTitan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 01:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ServiceTitan (December 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found.

K.e.coffman (talk) 02:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Your contribution history suggest WP:COI and / or WP:PAID relationship with the subjects that you have written about. Is this the case? --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, absolutely not. I've completely respected article rejections and have just been doing my best to contribute to the Wikipedia community. As you can see in my history, I have made edits and contributions across topics and industries - none of which have been paid for. Accessexpertise (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DeepBench

Hello, Accessexpertise. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DeepBench".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Coleman Research Group

Hello, Accessexpertise. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coleman Research Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 16:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ServiceTitan

Hello, Accessexpertise. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ServiceTitan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]