Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 14
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < February 13 | << Jan | February | Mar >> | February 15 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
February 14
[edit]
I am reaching out wondering why the article on Jamal Smallz was rejected.
Mustardseedvision (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Page lacks WP:RS supporting what is written and notability. He needs to pass WP:NMUSIC for a page. That may not be impossible - I've not searched for sources - but right now it does not have the sources. Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
05:51:47, 14 February 2019 review of submission by NickBarker123444431
[edit]
I would like to know why the article i just wrote about Jack post was rejected, it has lots of information, if its because of the fact there is not enough evidence
I'm okay with that, but the only reason why it was rejected was "undefined", and i would just like to know what i can add, or what feedback i can use to make it better
NickBarker123444431 (talk) 05:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- I would not have rejected that page. I don't know if he is notable. See WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENT for guidence Legacypac (talk) 06:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
07:42:09, 14 February 2019 review of submission by Your suraj
[edit]- Your suraj (talk · contribs)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Dear SamHolt6, I do not have any conflict of interest for this article. I am doing this article as part of my project in my college. I am studying BCA (Bachelor of Computer Application) 5th semester in Kathmandu, Nepal. And as a part of my project work or assignment, I have to have an article approved in Wikipedia. If it is approved I get good grades at project work. If not, I might get lower grades. Hence, in order to get good grades in my academic result, I need to get this article online. The reason I chose this subject is because I live nearby this organization (about 2 km walking distance). The reason you think that I have conflict of interest for this article is obvious because earlier I tried to write about the Managing Director of this company. That article didn't get approved. Therefore, I changed the subject and wrote about the company itself because I thought writing about living persons and getting it approved is difficult, in fact, very difficult. So, I wrote about the Company itself "City Express Money Transfer". Please believe me that I do not have any COI with the subject I've written. I researched about the article in details via Google. I collected the references also from Google. I am neither paid to write this article nor do I have any connection with the company directly. Please suggest me how I can get this article approved. Please tell me if I should remove some lines. I have neither exaggerated anything or tried to defame the company. I have only re-written what the references have mentioned. Please approve my article.
I have also already discussed this with SamHolt6. He said he'll remove COI issue, however, I needed to add more references. So I did the same.
And Yes! there are two same articles; one is in my sandbox and another is in draft. I have done everything for this article. I do not have COI issues and I have provided more than enough references. Please kindly trust me that this subject of mine is very notable in Nepal. It falls under the top three remittance companies
Please approve my site so that I can secure good grades in my academics. Your suraj (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Your suraj, Your choice of sources is poor.
- yellow.place, nepalyp.com, owler.com, aksbaje.com, nrb.org.np are trade listings
- educatenepal.com, merorojgari.com, nepalijob.com, merojob.com are job adverts
- sasecrtn.edu.np is an article about money transfer in which the business receives only a passing mention
- None of the first ten sources you've provided show that the company is in any way notable. You need to provide reliable, verifiable, independent sources which provide significant coverage (not passing mentions) which shows that the business meets the requirements of WP:NCORP.
- You claim here that "It falls under the top three remittance companies". Why is that claim not in the draft? Where is the source for it?
- The wikipedia community is only concerned with providing a reliable, quality encyclopedia (WP:5P). I'm sorry your grades hang on this task. The best way to succeed is to write an article which meets the wiki's standards. Cabayi (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I am hoping to submit a page regarding the Global Fashion Agenda. I work for Global Fashion Agenda and we own the copyright to the content I have uploaded. My submission has been denied due to copyright infringement, however the content was taken from our own websites, and been altered to make it neutral. It is difficult to rewrite the copy in different words when this is our own messaging in the first place. Please can you advise how I should specifically alter the piece in order for it to be approved?
Many thanks, Alice Alice Taylor 11 (talk) 08:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Alice Taylor 11 (talk) 08:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
09:00:47, 14 February 2019 review of submission by Hmdakb
[edit]
Hmdakb (talk) 09:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
10:59:53, 14 February 2019 review of draft by Fairdene
[edit]
Hi I have had a message which says:
"Procedurally declining until an administrator has revision deleted the copyright violations which I have removed. I have left inline notes where the violatons occurred so the submitter can readd any content, providing it is not a copyright violation, before resubmitting. Please do not resubmit until the copyright violation template has been removed by an administrator."
Sections have been redacted, which is fine but what are the next steps. It says I can't resubmit until the copyright violation template has been removed by an administrator. Is that process automatic and if so, how long does it usually take?
Fairdene (talk) 10:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Fairdene, It was removed 6 days ago. However, fixing the copyright violation was a first step, not a final step. There's still lots to fix before resubmitting. The points which leap out at me are...
- The section at Draft:Ric Lewis#Ric Lewis needs sorting out. It looks like it belongs in a {{Infobox person}}.
- The draft needs to link to other articles (Wikipedia:Wikilink, MOS:LINKSTYLE). If the article is going to be part of the wiki you need to weave it in to the fabric, not leave it on the sidelines.
- References should be placed after punctuation, not before.
- Some peacock language needs fixing, for example "...is a passionate advocate...".
- The section "Past Board positions include...", why is board capitalised?, wouldn't it look better as either a bullet point list, or better still as a chunk of text, "Lewis has previously served on the boards of London First, International Inspiration, ...".
- Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- G.Reece246 (talk · contribs)
Hi there! Why has my article been rejected? Have you any advice on how to make it work out? G.Reece246 (talk) 12:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Read and familiarize yourself with the content policies. See below. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
13:35:25, 14 February 2019 review of submission by Hmdakb
[edit]
Hmdakb (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
17:45:56, 14 February 2019 review of submission by Sixday7
[edit]
Kindly review 2019 PKNP F.C. season page since the season already started and the club is playing in top divison of Malaysian football, Malaysia Super League. Thank you.
Sixday7 (talk) 17:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
18:39:10, 14 February 2019 review of submission by DSTULLOCH
[edit]Provided references as requested on January 18. Now asking for a follow up review DSTULLOCH (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
20:29:58, 14 February 2019 review of submission by Tigresj
[edit]
This is my grandfather, I created the IMDB profile, any help to add it at wikipedia?
Tigresj (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
20:49:49, 14 February 2019 review of submission by Irshav
[edit]
Irshav (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC) This is official TENNIS TOURNAMENT. All references are there. Why do you decline it?? I really don't understand.
Okay so I started a new version writing "Alex in Pawn Shop Pawns", it's gotten denied two times now, and every time i've retyped it, its gotten worse! So this is my third time, and I worked really hard on it, but i keep making edits to try and not be able to publish it to get an acception, can you teach me how to make it better? Could you please help, i'm trying to ask you politely...
AlexBd25 (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
21:30:42, 14 February 2019 review of draft by AlexBd25
[edit]
Please consider accepting, this took a really long time to make (a month!) if theres not enough references or you decline it, don't delete it, I'll make edits to it, please......
AlexBd25 (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- AlexBd25, You received an accurate response from David notMD, and a longer, considerate and considered response from MjolnirPants both of which you blanked. Don't expect anybody else to waste their time on you. Cabayi (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Cabayi, Okay, first, rude, no need to say I blanked on them, I said "Thank You" to BOTH of them because I needed advice on how to make my ARTICLE better, and left. Second, you can whine about me on my talk page. Third, you posted it your reply 2 DAYS after I sent that in. Fourth, If i COULD reply, your probably the one who locked me from replyin', so, sorry, I ain't bein' the one who is being stubborn. AlexBd25 (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
22:09:58, 14 February 2019 review of submission by AlbanyStreetEdinburgh
[edit]The reply states there are insufficient references. Was this because reference was made to a book without stating that one whole chapter documents the full biography of this previously unrecorded, and important, life? The existence of this Chinese man has been reported on many occasions in different sources since his biography being published. Should these be listed to strengthen the case for inclusion? The attempt to have this entered in Wiki as a seperate entry is because this is a significant historical discovery and important in the context of mapping Britain's ethnic immigration history.