Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 May 17
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < May 16 | << Apr | May | Jun >> | May 18 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
May 17
[edit]07:11:43, 17 May 2018 review of submission by Suri2550
[edit]Suri2550 (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Suri2550 - Assuming you're querying why your article was Declined, it's because it hasn't got any sources at all. Reliable, independent sources are essential for Wikipedia, as they show Notability and let readers Verify the content. Without them, your draft won't be approved. Hope this helps. KJP1 (talk) 07:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Mornetmarx (talk · contribs)
I am trying to load an article of our kids primary school on Wikipedia. However, it has been rejected - and asking for external refernces. Can you please help me to sort this out? Mornetmarx (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Mornetmarx - Hi, primary schools aren't generally Notable such that they warrant an article on here. See Wikipedia:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. There's nothing in your sourcing that suggests this primary school should be an exception to that general rule. KJP1 (talk) 07:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
My article gets removed - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KeepSolid I need assistance. WalkingTheWire (talk) 11:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- WalkingTheWire - Because it’s a weakly-sourced advertisement. What you need to understand is that Wikipedia’s an encyclopaedia, not a marketing platform. KJP1 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
18:54:23, 17 May 2018 review of submission by Harris lauraashley
[edit]I'm looking to get the page published similar to other law reviews. For example, I modeled the GLTR page similar to that of the Berkeley Technology Law Journal, but our page was rejected. Could you help explain what more I need to add to the Georgetown page in order to get it published? Thank you.
Harris lauraashley (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Have you done a WP:COI disclosure? Legacypac (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
19:06:01, 17 May 2018 review of submission by JoanneFisher60
[edit]Why is Amazon not a good source? Can I use my publisher's website as a reference?
JoanneFisher60 (talk) 19:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Amazon is a sales site with unmoderated user generate content and promotional discriptions provided by authors. Your own publisher has a big WP:COI publishig self servibg content. Really, you should wait until a disinterested editor writes you up - don't do an WP:AUTOBIO Legacypac (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
19:53:03, 17 May 2018 review of submission by Olivia Nabiryo
[edit]
It has been over two months since i made the necessary corrections but my article has not been re-reviewed. I am completely certain that i followed all the guidelines that the previous editor sent to me for correction on decline of my article previously. What else do i need to do to have it re-reviewed? please help me Thank you
Olivia Nabiryo (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hello @Olivia Nabiryo: I did your previous review, but I'm afraid a lot of your changes have not addressed the issue. Part of the problem is you need to understand what footnotes are for.
- For example, you say "He attended Kabalega Primary School" and then you have a footnote... to a GoogleMaps coordinates where the school is. That is not what a footnote is for. What you need to have is a footnote to a news article, mention in book, etc that says Kaheru attended this school. That's the whole point of a footnote: a footnote is to say "here is a source which proves this fact I say is true.
- Similarly, you mention when/where he was married, but your footnote is to a site for the church itself. How does that prove that Kaheru was married there?
- You have entire sections like "Hobbies" that have no sourcing at all. How do we know these claims about Kaheru are accurate? Because you haven't sourced them, we can't tell. You need to remove any fact that you cannot clearly source.
- You have a large article full of claims about Kaheru, but almost none of your footnotes are about Kaheru. They're about things that his life is related to, but as a short summary: if I click any of your footnotes and search for the word "Kaheru" on a page, if I don't find his name on that page, that footnote should not be there.
- You need to go through your article, and for any fact on Kaheru ask yourself "do I have a footnote, and does the footnote prove my claim about Kaheru?" Any footnote that does not prove a claim must be removed, and any fact about Kaheru that cannot be proven must be removed. MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Blair152 (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
I've submitted two articles here about the Galactic Federal Union and they've been declined twice because I put them in the wrong place. Unfortunately, that was the only place I could find on both occasions. Where's the page for writing the article?
- You are supposed to put the content in the article, not in the edit summary. Unfortunately, an examination of the content from the edit summary reveals that this is a hoax or something from your gaming blog or something, not an actual article on an actual subject. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. If you want somebody to host your fiction drafts, create a page in MySpace or LiveJournal for it. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the WSJ mention and Forbes contribution (*as suggested by the reviewer) and added a citation to a New York Post article which is a reliable source and provides more information about the company. Can you please review.
MrBernardKendall (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
21:24:14, 17 May 2018 review of submission by CarolinaCupcake
[edit]Just looking for feedback! Anything I need to add or change to get it approved? CarolinaCupcake (talk) 21:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- 1. Do you have any connection with the company which puts this show on? If so, you MUST disclose your connection and conflict of interest.
- 2. We need more from objective sources, less from the show's own website. We do not need material equivalent to what you'd find in the program book. For example: you link to an article about the free-admission APHA mess, but don't put any of it into the article.
- 3. You need to make it clear that this is not a fan-run, not-for-profit convention, but a for-profit "ticket show." --Orange Mike | Talk 01:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Mike! Thanks for the feedback. In response to your points:
- 1. I have no connection to this convention other than it being a local con I attend. I noticed it's one of the only cons in the area that doesn't have a wikipedia page and decided to make one.
- 2. I modeled the page after the approved pages of other locals cons including Oni-Con, RealmsCon and Ikkicon, all of which include multiple references to animecons.com, which actually is not a self-reported source. Animecons.com is actively managed by a third party who verifies the information posted there.
- 3. Tax status doesn't seem to be required information for any of the other con pages included in the List of anime conventions group, can you clarify why it's required in this case? I don't have any knowledge of the internal business structure of Delta H Con so I have no idea if they're for-profit or not. Many cons don't publish that info. --CarolinaCupcake (talk) 15:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)