Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 July 18
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 17 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 19 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 18
[edit]10:54:11, 18 July 2018 review of submission by 49.33.100.29
[edit]- 49.33.100.29 (talk · contribs)
Hi, This is regarding a draft (Draft:ThePrint) that I have submitted and it has been more than 15 days but it is still pending for review. Does anyone has any idea when it will get reviewed? Thanks in advance!
49.33.100.29 (talk) 10:54, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @49.33.100.29: five weeks or more. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Actually five weeks is the current maximum wait time, but the vast majority get reviewed sooner. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for taking time to respond. It would be really appreciated if anyone of you please review this draft (Draft:ThePrint) just to ensure whether i followed Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.32.118.22 (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @49.32.118.22: - I've just reviewed your draft and declined it. The reasons are slightly different to the usual reasons, but I think I've laid them out clearly on the draft. Please contact me directly (not here, as I might miss it) if you'd like me to clarify something. Cheers, Nosebagbear (talk) 15:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also pinging @49.33.100.29 and 223.189.16.134: - possible a dynamic range is being used. Nosebagbear (talk)
- Hi @49.32.118.22: - I've just reviewed your draft and declined it. The reasons are slightly different to the usual reasons, but I think I've laid them out clearly on the draft. Please contact me directly (not here, as I might miss it) if you'd like me to clarify something. Cheers, Nosebagbear (talk) 15:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for taking time to respond. It would be really appreciated if anyone of you please review this draft (Draft:ThePrint) just to ensure whether i followed Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.32.118.22 (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
11:11:40, 18 July 2018 review of submission by Yash Karan Astrologer
[edit]Dear Sir ,
Please help me know that which content in my article needs to be deleted or edited. I shall make the necessary changes as per requirement.
Thank you very much !
Regards ! Yash Karan Astrologer (talk) 11:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is no usable content in your draft, we only summarise what reliable, independent published sources have to say about a subject. If there are no such sources then we cannot have an article. Theroadislong (talk) 11:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Marc-Olivier Strauss-Kahn (new page)
[edit]19:21:07, 18 July 2018 review of submission by Lettucecup
[edit]- Lettucecup (talk · contribs)
The new page for notable subject (living person) Marc-Olivier Strauss-Kahn (Managing Director and Chief Economist of the central bank of France, Banque de France -- and the brother of Domonique Strauss-Kahn) has been entirely re-written, shortened, and is deeply referenced with reliable, published independent sources. All extraneous detail from the initial draft has been purged, a select list of Strauss-Kahn's official publications added/referenced, and the final content reshaped for Wikipedia's neutral tone. The editor who reviewed it initially gave notes and feedback about problems with the first draft, which have been addressed. He requested that another editor (rather than himself) do the next review. Hopeful it's now good to go. Requesting another editor to please move it forward. Thanks!
Lettucecup (talk) 19:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Lettucecup