Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 9
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< December 8 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 10 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 9
[edit]04:30:45, 9 December 2018 review of submission by Zvowell
[edit]Hello, help desk, thanks for considering my question. I submitted an article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Don_Morris) that was declined on October 30 for the following reason: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia."
My question is more a request for clarification. Is it that the article does not contain enough secondary sources? If so, can I ask if newspaper articles that document the article's subject and his activities would qualify as secondary sources. I had hoped that the article contained enough secondary sources.
Thanks you! zv Zvowell (talk) 04:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- MaynardClark (talk · contribs)
Draft:Christine Mitchell has been rejected twice because it appeared to be promotional. The first reviewer had told me that he would not reject it on notability grounds, but the second reviewer claimed that the article did not demonstrate notability. MaynardClark (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
MaynardClark (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Opinions may differ. Legacypac (talk) 05:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
08:01:38, 9 December 2018 review of draft by 109.233.47.132
[edit]
Hello. In said article, the first source is grave finder. It must be filled every time. And filing should be Imie - Teresa and Nazwisko -Adamczewska. How to make such note? 109.233.47.132 (talk) 08:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
109.233.47.132 (talk) 08:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Place instructions explaining how to use the grave finder after the {{Cite web}} template, but before the closing
</ref>
tag for the citation. Such primary sources are not ideal. Replace it with a better source, such as a scholarly book, if possible. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
09:55:55, 9 December 2018 review of submission by Shane Chambers
[edit]
Hi guys
I tried to ad a new page for the Bravo TV show 'Get a Room with Carson and Thom', though it seems it was rejected.
I know this is my first attempt, so please excuse my probably inexcusable ignorance, but I'm not sure what I've done here that doesn't meet guidelines.
Being my first attempt, I truly welcome anyone's feedback, including instructions on how I might add a page for a TV show that follows guidelines.
Thanks people. I love all of your work, of course ;-).
Shane Shane Chambers (talk) 09:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Shane Chambers. There is much to master in order to successfully create a new article. The welcome basket of links left on your talk page provides excellent starting points. For writing about TV shows, you'll want to thoroughly understand notability (the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia). Also, Wikipedia:WikiProject Television offers a number of topic-specific guidelines. Many editors find it easier to start by editing existing articles, and build up to creating new ones. See Wikipedia:Community portal for ways to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
05:23:00, 9 December 2018 review of submission by 119.92.15.205
[edit]Excuse me, Draft:AMKTech Versions needs some reliable sources. On which way should I be able to get resources? 119.92.15.205 (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Generally speaking, reliable sources can be found among books, articles, and news reports. A library is a good place to find such resources. If no such independent sources can be found, Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
17:04:42, 9 December 2018 review of submission by Sudesh tomar13
[edit]- Sudesh tomar13 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Sudesh tomar13 (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
(Resume removed) Legacypac (talk) 05:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Sudesh tomar13 Editors may create a user page containing limited autobiographical information for the purpose of collaboration with other editors. If that was what you were trying to do with User:Sudesh tomar13/sandbox, then you do not need to post the content here or submit it for review. Simply write at User:Sudesh tomar13.
- It is draft articles that need to be submitted for review before being published as encyclopedia articles. If that is what your sandbox submission was intended as, then please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). --Worldbruce (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
19:12:41, 9 December 2018 review of draft by Sportscaptain
[edit]
How do I save my draft?
Sportscaptain (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Sportscaptain. Click the blue "Publish page" button at the bottom left (see Help:Editing for an illustration and more information). Once the page exists, the button will be titled "Publish changes". It means "save"; what is saved is still a draft, it isn't published to article space. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
21:26:10, 9 December 2018 review of submission by Joshua Beschutzer
[edit]
Please return Company B 6th Florida Infantry to "Draft". If it was submitted by me for posting, the error was mine; the posted version has also been stripped of biographical sketches.
Joshua Beschutzer (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not inclined to return a good page to draft. You can continue to edit it in mainspace. Nice page. Legacypac (talk) 03:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
23:38:18, 9 December 2018 review of draft by Fortriudavid
[edit]- Fortriudavid (talk · contribs)
Incorrectly recorded date format for downloading web sources - not sure how to resolve that. Numerous references to same publication but differing pages - appreciate how best to correct that
- Hi Fortriudavid. Don't use ordinals with dates on Wikipedia. In other words, access-date=26 November 2018, not access-date=26th November 2018. See MOS:DATES for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)