Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 8
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < December 7 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 9 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 8
[edit]07:51:25, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Bharatudaipur
[edit]The other Malls of same group has the wikipedia page. How can I add the Wikipedia page for Forum Celebration mall Udaipur
Bharatudaipur (talk) 07:51, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
09:31:08, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Sarvasuddi Bandi Raju
[edit]}}
FIRST TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING HELP ON THE LINE BELOW THIS LINE. Take as many lines as you need. -->}}
Sarvasuddi Bandi Raju (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- There is no question. I'll make sure the draft is actioned. Legacypac (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
11:31:23, 8 December 2018 review of draft by Leonardoamico
[edit]
Dear Lee Vilenski (and dear Wikipedia team. I did the corrections you suggested me.
I removed all links inside the text body. I put only Wikipedia links.
Please, tell me if these corrections are oK ?
Thank you for your help.
With all my respect.
Sincerely.
Leonardoamico (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- User:Leonardoamico - The page is copied from a web site and so is a copyright violation. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
11:57:48, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Ilovepitts
[edit]- Ilovepitts (talk · contribs)
This page was the subject of a deletion years ago by an editor who has since been banned. I did a draft after Sara got in the Hall of Fame. It was rejected by an editor who considered the prior history. That editor is now gone. Sara Jay is in the adult Hall of Fame. If there is one standard in the adult industry for notable.. it is that. It is not as if she has not fame in her own industry. Here are the standards all of which she qualifies for. She's been in mainstream media, is well known an a member of hall of fame. What am I missing here? Have I messed up the citations somehow? If my citations aren't enough, those can be easily fixed. If the draft is never going to be accepted no matter what she does, I guess I'd like to know so I don't waste time.
Pornographic actors and models Shortcuts
WP:PORNBIO WP:PORNSTAR
The following criteria are relevant only to people involved in pornography (and should not be raised with regard to actors and models outside the pornography industry):
The person has won a well-known and significant industry award. Awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration. The person has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography; starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature; or being a member of an industry hall of fame such as the AVN Hall of Fame, XRCO Hall of Fame or equivalent. The person has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.
Ilovepitts (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- User:Ilovepitts - There has been considerable discussion of whether there should be articles about this person, with four deletion debates, three of which concluded that she is not notable, and that the articles should be deleted. The most recent is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Jay (4th nomination). On the one hand, no amount of improving the citations will change that. A decision has already been made. On the other hand, it appears that you are saying that the deletion decision should be revisited or reviewed. The procedure for doing that in Wikipedia is Deletion Review. Trying to rework the draft will be a waste of your time and ours unless you go to Deletion Review first. That is what you should do. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
13:53:24, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Skkhanfilms
[edit]- Skkhanfilms (talk · contribs)
Skkhanfilms (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
15:19:00, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Skkhanfilms
[edit]- Skkhanfilms (talk · contribs)
Skkhanfilms (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
20:37:32, 8 December 2018 review of submission by 109.252.83.19
[edit]Galois axis
Is not explaining the meaning of terms is the main purpose of any encyclopedia. Why wouldn’t a term stand alone in an article?
109.252.83.19 (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
21:20:32, 8 December 2018 review of draft by Davidshahhah
[edit]- Davidshahhah (talk · contribs)
Davidshahhah (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
21:20:32, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Davidshahhah
- Davidshahhah (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
I am asking for assistance for the article I am writing. I am writing on the subject "Murray Howe." It has not been published yet and was originally denied and I edited it again after. Would like to hear feedback and how to get it officially published.
Davidshahhah (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
22:08:42, 8 December 2018 review of draft by Arandompersonwhoishere
[edit]
I created an article for satirical purposes, on an actual fictional character who exists for satirical purposes.
Arandompersonwhoishere (talk) 22:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- So the reviewer was correct that it is just a joke. Your submission did not attribute it to anyone else, and it does not appear to be worth attributing. You are wasting your time and ours, and are likely to be blocked as not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
22:49:20, 8 December 2018 review of submission by Arandompersonwhoishere
[edit]- Arandompersonwhoishere (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
My article was blocked for appearing to be just a joke. I was writing about a character whose existence is a joke, so it was impossible to not write something funny if I was to write a true article about him.