Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 17 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 18

[edit]

04:46:42, 18 December 2018 review of draft by Deerlaos

[edit]


Deerlaos (talk) 04:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Deerlaos: - this draft was rejected as it says - because it had no content. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06:29:20, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Doman tudu

[edit]


Doman tudu (talk) 06:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doman tudu - Your autobiography is an autobiography, has no references, and does not make a credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:26:27, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Malek404

[edit]


Malek404 (talk) 10:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Malek404: - while I can't answer if Frayae's rejection was legitimate, I do agree with the previous (and still correct) reviews - this draft looks sources that actually cover the subject in depth - three only have a couple of lines mention and even the first source has only a large paragraph's worth. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

11:55:58, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Clive sweeting

[edit]


Importance of the subject undeniable. Check with Greek Wikipedia. Bishops are deemed notable and Meliton certainly was. Subject needs a more open discussion open to all who wish to judge it.

Clive sweeting (talk) 11:55, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clive sweeting Different wikipedia spaces (Such as the German, or Greek wikipedias) have different criteria for notability. The English is probably the most stringent. There's nothing I can do for this article, except forward to an admin, as the article is I believe WP:SALTed; which stops regular user such as myself from moving them. I believe Legacypac has already done this, however. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Clive sweeting, User:Lee Vilenski - On the one hand, it is true that Orthodox bishops are considered notable. On the other hand, this draft has problems with verifiability and with tone, and repeated re-creations may have caused it to be created-protected (salted). I suggest Deletion Review. Some achievements or distinctions, such as being a bishop or being a Senator or performing in the Olympics, are considered ipso facto notable, but that achievement or distinction must be verified, and the article must be neutral. If you want a "more open discussion", go to Deletion Review, but first be sure that your draft is verifiable and satisfies neutral point of view. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:15:36, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Vrgamer

[edit]


Hi sufficient coverage and proof of exposure and notability internationally has been presented. Notability being very subjective it would be best to provide specific reason or improvements needed to accomplish the minimum required. Vrgamer (talk) 12:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vrgamer - sadly, notability (at least in wikipedia's sense) isn't subjective. They require Reliable sources to comment on the subject in-depth and they must be WP:INDEPENDENT of the subject. Please read Wikipedia's notability guidelines for inclusion on the subject. I don't think this software meets these guidelines. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14:29:31, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Translationservicessingapore

[edit]


I'm new to wikipedia. I would like to give some details of translation services in Singapore in wikipedia. There are lots of users enquire about translation services and guidance on the process of getting their documents translated. I would appreciate if you could give me some advice on how to publish on wikipedia. thank you. Translationservicessingapore (talk) 14:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Nothing worth seeing.

16:14:53, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Nithin Rock

[edit]


Nithin Rock (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


16:15:20, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Nithin Rock

[edit]


Nithin Rock (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am Karingala Nithin (Nithin Rock ). I am from Hyderabad. Nick name Shiva. To Become Actor. Wish me on 16 Feb.

OFFICIAL PAGE link here

Facebook: NITHINROCKOFFICIALPAGE

Instagram: Instagram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nithin Rock (talk • contribs) 16:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:17:06, 18 December 2018 review of submission by NithinRock

[edit]


Nithin Rock (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:39:21, 18 December 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Chris04550

[edit]


I attempted to create a page on a musical instrument that is the successor to Roland_AX-7 and Roland_AX-Synth, similar instruments deemed notable enough to warrant wikipedia entries. I have no special interest in this instrument, so the reviewer's mention of WP:COI and WP:PROMO do not apply. I would just like guidance on how to create new articles. Chris04550 (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris04550. Glad to hear that you don't have a conflict of interest. Whether an editor intends to promote something or not, the article they produce can still be promotional, particularly if it is based entirely on the company's website and press releases.
Don't assume that the existence of Roland AX-7 and Roland AX-Synth means that they're notable and should have separate Wikipedia articles. I've suggested at Talk:Roland AX-1#Merger proposal that, in accordance with the notability guideline, all of these models be merged into one article that covers the entire line of Roland keytars. If, after a week or so, a consensus has formed to do that, you can perform the merger by following the steps outlined in Wikipedia:Merging#How to merge. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:14:15, 18 December 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Zimbali Beyoncé

[edit]



Zimbali Beyoncé (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:04:40, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Markcoomber

[edit]


Hi, I need help. I'm trying to create an article for my home village of Widdrington. There is a housing project a few miles away from our village called Widdrington Station, which has an article. The reviewers of the article which I've been trying to create for Widdrington Village, keep stating that our village, and the housing project are one and the same village (they're really not), and that two articles are not required. Please help!!!! Markcoomber (talk) 22:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted per WP:GEOLAND, after modifications and with tags. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:21:07, 18 December 2018 review of submission by Bradleyagin

[edit]


I am simply putting this here as a resource for research! please reconsider this bradleyagin 23:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Bradleyagin Your draft looks like a test edit, rather than suitible for wikipedia. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2018_December_18&oldid=952951283"