Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 January 28
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < January 27 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 29 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
January 28
[edit]12:14:21, 28 January 2017 review of submission by Parchahimanshuphil
[edit]- Parchahimanshuphil (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Parchahimanshuphil (talk) 12:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Why my article on a an important Indian poet is not accepted for publication?
- The article in question is Draft:Dayanchand Maayna. My own comment is that it contains peacock language. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
13:24:54, 28 January 2017 review of submission by Interpretation of Wisdom
[edit]- Interpretation of Wisdom (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Interpretation of Wisdom (talk) 13:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Please,this interpretation of Wisdom is quite interpreted from another perceptive and I see no reason why this article is not accepted because the Submission declined by Dodger67 the reason is not genuine enough as far as I am concerned by Mr.Olusola David, AyibiowuInterpretation of Wisdom (talk)
- The page in question is User:Interpretation of Wisdom/sandbox. I found the submission difficult to read and follow, and am wondering whether you are having difficulty in writing in English, and whether you might be better off to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language. Also, as the reviewer said, we already have an article at Wisdom. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
13:27:48, 28 January 2017 review of submission by David hewick
[edit]- David hewick (talk · contribs)
I do not know why the date in Reference 17 is being queried. The format seems the same as the other acceptable reference dates, and December 31, 1954 is a valid date. Am I missing something obvious?David hewick (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
David hewick (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi David hewick you had some extraneous text in the date field, I've fixed it. I've also made all the dates consistent with the standard British usage - day month year, rather than month day year, which is the common American style. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Dodger. Much appreciated.David hewick (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)