Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 January 27
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < January 26 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 28 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
January 27
[edit]
The editor (NikolaiHo) who rejected an entry I submitted about an author has not replied to two detailed messages I have left on his "talk" page. His rejection was based on the "notable" criterion, which I dispute and can provide ample verifiable evidence to support a "notable" claim. If the editor does not reply in a timely manner, I want another editor or a third opinion. Giacomo44 (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Giacomo44 (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- User:Giacomo44 - First, the draft was declined primarily for tone reasons rather than for notability reasons. I have reviewed the draft and I agree that it is written non-neutrally, apparently to praise its subject rather than to describe him neutrally. Second, however, as to notability, you have only provided one reference. It is usually a good idea to provide at least two references in order to establish general notability. Third, it appears that the editor who declined your draft edits irregularly. I also see that you expressed hostility toward the reviewer for their failure to respond to you. We are all volunteers, and expressing hostility toward another volunteer editor is not a useful way to get your draft approved. I would suggest that finding more references and changing the tone would be a more productive approach. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
17:14:30, 27 January 2017 review of submission by Terrybraunstein
[edit]- Terrybraunstein (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Terrybraunstein (talk) 17:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Terry_Braunstein_(artist)
Please remove the following from my page--it has been reviewed by a number of people, and it has been over a year since it was published. If it requires further review, would you please do so or tell me how this should be accomplished:
This page is a new unreviewed article. This template should be removed once the page has been reviewed by someone other than its creator; if necessary the page should be appropriately tagged for cleanup. (January 2016)
Thank you.
Terry Braunstein
- The page in question appears to be Terry Braunstein (artist). I see that the page has been tagged for a long time. However, please read the conflict of interest guideline. It isn't "your page"; it is a page about you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)