Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 November 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 27 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 28

[edit]

00:12:17, 28 November 2016 review of submission by Michaeltsantini

[edit]


I am not being allowed to edit the Wikipedia article "Progressive Creation."

Progressive creationism is not pseudoscience. This is a bias and unjust broad brushing of the field. Progressive creation is not pseudoscience because it adheres to the scientific method of investigation, while logically attempting to reconcile different understanding of the fossil record with the mainstream scientific consensus.

Now granted, some forms of creation science utilize pseudoscience heavily, like young earth creationism. Young earth creationism attempt to map the Bible into scientific facts and this is unacceptable. However, progressive creationism is a subset of old earth creationism, which adheres to the tenets of scientific investigation and honest debate.

Please let me edit this article with references. I have a doctorate in the fields of science and theology and am well equipped to do so. Thank you sir.

Michaeltsantini (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michael. I don't see any evidence that you've been prevented from editing any article. It seems that you've simply had a disagreement with an editor at the page of the article in which you have an interest. Your best approach will be to discuss the matter with that editor on the Talk page of the article, which is here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03:12:11, 28 November 2016 review of submission by Rahul.pradip

[edit]


Had written an article explaining Experimental marketing but it was declined. Wanted to know reason for same so that can improve on same.

Rahul.pradip (talk) 03:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons are explained in both rejection notices. Did you read them? Maproom (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06:12:41, 28 November 2016 review of submission by Chandana jadala

[edit]


Chandana jadala (talk) 06:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need your assistance for Ram Talluri's profile Draft. Actually Ram Talluri is a producer who produces films under SRT Entertainments banner, He has produced Chuttalabbai telugu movie recently. Now he is going to plan another movie with hero Raviteja. I want to create a Wikipedia account for Ram Talluri. Here I have provided some of the main websites source links also for reference. Kindly suggest me the changes and work I need to do on this profile.

Thanks in advance. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Hello, Chandana. The two reviewers who have looked at this submission agree that you haven't provided any evidence that the subject is "notable" in the sense that Wikipedia uses the word. In order to do so, you will need to find reliable third-party sources that discuss him in depth, and not just as passing mentions. Without that, it is unlikely that your submission will be accepted. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

06:35:50, 28 November 2016 review of submission by Jordan08

[edit]


IUB_(contraceptive) is redirected to IUD with Copper. There is no way to view the article. How can this be corrected?

Jordan08 (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jordan. That action was taken by User:Doc James, whose Talk page is here. You'll need to discuss the matter directly with that editor. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That article was nearly entirely based on primary sources. Per WP:MEDRS we tend to require high quality recent secondary sources. Therefore redirected to the main topic were this specific type of IUD can be discussed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:11:21, 28 November 2016 review of submission by 88.68.129.221

[edit]


88.68.129.221 (talk) 13:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC) A reply was received stating that the article read more like an advertisement. The article is about a campaigner on women issues and abuse who has written a publication on social mobility for the marginalised. How can this be re-edited to comply with Wiki.[reply]

As this is the only edit from this IP, and you have not specified the article name, there's no way I can help you. Sorry. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:06:09, 28 November 2016 review of submission by Jolemonpop

[edit]


Hi, I need to change the headline text to my article to read Omni Fight Club instead of OFC Main Text. I didn't realize that this was the public name and not something for my own reference. Please let me know how to go about changing this. Thank you kindly :)

Jolemonpop (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done TimothyJosephWood 18:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Hello, Jolemonpop. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. The requested change in title has been made. However, in its current state (and regardless of the title), your submission is unlikely to be accepted. It has no sources and much of its brief prose will be construed as promotional and/or advertising. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]