Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 November 12
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 11 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 13 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 12
[edit]
ChristineDanner (talk) 01:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- You both created a sandbox draft, which was declined as reading promotionally, and created an article C. Lloyd Mahaffey. That is, after you didn't like having your draft declined, you decided to create another copy in article space, where you would take your chances on having it nominated for deletion, and it was nominated for deletion. This Help Desk is for Articles for Creation, which you chose to bypass. If you want advice on how to prevent the article in article space from being deleted, I suggest that you ask at the Teahouse. Also, do you have a connection with Mahaffey (which would explain your hurry to get his article into Wikipedia)? Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
07:25:03, 12 November 2016 review of submission by Aankitmishra
[edit]- Aankitmishra (talk · contribs)
Aankitmishra OR Draft:Perennial Math
Hello Senior Editors, I recently submitted one of my clients article in Wikipedia it's my first experience in submitting article here!! I really thanks to all members and Sr. editors who have supported me by far.
My current request of Draft:Perennial Math was rejected, because of unavailability of reliable sources
Can any one of you please help me with what next should I do? What if the reliable sources are not available or now dead? will my article never ever get publish without reliable sources or how?
Looking for your kind guidance! Thanks Aankitmishra (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Aankitmishra. If no reliable sources about the subject exist, then the topic does not belong in Wikipedia. You ask about "dead" sources. If you mean people, people are not reliable sources whether living or dead. It is publications (books, academic journal articles, newspapers, magazines, broadcasts, etc.) that can be reliable sources, depending on the type of work, who wrote it, and who published it. If you mean web URLs that are dead because of link rot, being ephemeral can indicate a lack of reliability. A source that is well regarded in the world is likely to be preserved - in print, on microfilm, in a web archive, in databases, or whatnot. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
07:52:14, 12 November 2016 review of submission by PierLuigi Gentili
[edit]I am wondering if my contribution will be considered and reviewed.
PierLuigi Gentili (talk) 07:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have read the first paragraph of your submission again. I haven't checked the references that you have added to see whether they provide notability, but the first paragraph is written in an almost impenetrable sort of buzz-speak. If you are really trying to provide encyclopedic knowledge rather than to promote an idea, please rewrite the first paragraph to talk about chemical artificial intelligence rather than about a program on chemical artificial intelligence. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Teamshoudy (talk · contribs)
Help me to create an article Draft:Eddie Marshudi, do whatever it takes to publish it on Eddie Marshudi.
help me out to be accepted on article submission Teamshoudy (talk) 09:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Teamshoudy. I have left you a note on your talk page concerning this issue. Please read it carefully. Voceditenore (talk) 16:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- User:Teamshoudy - It is clear that you are only in Wikipedia to get one draft accepted, to "do whatever it takes". Read the conflict of interest guideline and state what your association is with Eddie Marshudi. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)