Help desk
< April 24	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 26 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 25

01:17:18, 25 April 2015 review of submission by DmitryPopovRU

DmitryPopovRU (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alex Gilbert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Firstly I am not asking for any review at this point. Is this page really not notable yet? There is enough secondary sources and even alot covering what he does. Please someone give me advice etc. and for someone to please look at the sources. I need peoples opinion.

Thank You! Dmitry

--DmitryPopovRU (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC) DmitryPopovRU (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DmitryPopovR: The thing is, what makes him notable? He's a bloke whose infancy was marred by being dumped in an orphanage. He now has a career in New Zealand. One presumes his adoptive parents love him. Great news for him. He made a bit of a media splash over it. WP:BLP1E applies. Fiddle Faddle 07:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:19:22, 25 April 2015 review of submission by NamelessAuthor

NamelessAuthor (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

I submitted a page to be reviewed. It was deleted. Do you have the original text so that I can make the revisions?

• 13:02, 23 November 2014 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Rocky Harris (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.thesundevils.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=207911775)

NamelessAuthor (talk) 01:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NamelessAuthor: Since the draft was deleted for unambiguous copyright infringement, you're better off just recreating the article from scratch. Articles deleted with the WP:G12 speedy deletion criteria typically have "no non-infringing content on the page worth saving". Take great care that the new article you create is not a copyright infringement either. wia (talk) 12:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:20:04, 25 April 2015 review of submission by Mrsjomason

Mrsjomason (talk · contribs)

Hello, I am trying to put together an encycolopaedia entry for a company but I have gone a bit too advert-y. Any advice on making this more neutral would be gratefully received. I thought if I removed the detail on the individual products and maybe reduced some of the more opinion-type statements relating to the brewing process, that might help. Thanks Jo Mrsjomason (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrsjomason: Hi, yes cutting out the flowery language in the product, history and brewing process sections will help. The adverbs and descriptive adjectives (like lavishly satisfying aftertaste) read like a Freedom Brewery ad or brochure. Just state the facts as they are, and avoid value judgments or subjective calls about how delicious a particular beer is, or how extensive a particular renovation is. Let readers click through to an external link to Freedom Brewery if they want to read the five-dollar descriptions. wia (talk) 03:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]