Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 June 24
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < June 23 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 25 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
June 24
[edit]05:40:42, 24 June 2014 review of submission by Eeevanwok
[edit]
Hello, I am trying to add references to my draft article via footnotes, but don't seem to be doing it properly. You will note that I have tried to add one in the "Early Life" section, but when I preview that section, the article stops at that point. I would be grateful if you could help me with that. thank you, Lesley
Eeevanwok (talk) 05:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
07:56:18, 24 June 2014 review of submission by Ami Chuck Oki
[edit]If you could let me know how I can improve the article, that would be helpful. I want to Mae pages of the band in other languages as well, Ami Chuck Oki (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
17:22:33, 24 June 2014 review of submission by Matthewhburch
[edit]
I could use some input on the article's name, as another editor pointed out that it appears to them to be a neologism. There isn't a consensus name in the space science community for propulsion methods utilizing fuel accelerated by a remote fuel source. I could simply name the article "propulsion methods utilizing fuel accelerated by a remote fuel source" but this name seems offensively long-winded. Comments? I'd prefer comments here Draft talk:Remote fuel propulsion, on the draft page, just to keep things in one place. I'll watch this area too, of course. Matthewhburch (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
This issue has been resolved. The article has been renamed "Propulsion methods utilizing fuel accelerated from a remote fuel source" Matthewhburch (talk) 19:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
19:07:54, 24 June 2014 review of submission by BarbieHarris21
[edit]
I don't know how to go about getting this article into an acceptable format.
I am doing this job for a client, and I'm at a stand still with being able to properly provide the sources he has given me in order to get his page published.
Any help, advice and/or clear instructions would be so greatly appreciated.
BarbieHarris21 (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Thank you! Barbie
BarbieHarris21 (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- @BarbieHarris21: Thank you for your transparency. Fortunately the review process limits WP:COI by ripping it away. You need to know that paid editing is deprecated, though allowed by the current rules. Thus you will have few problems provided you work always through the submit for review process.
- Please read and implement Wikipedia:Notability (music) for this article. Note that your text is flagrant PR material and needs to be edited back to "Dull but worthy" (an easy way of understanding WP:NPOV), and that many of the sources you have provided will have online counterparts. Since we write for the ordinary reader, and ordinary readers wish to check the references, we work hard to make it easy for them to do so where we can.
- All inline links must be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. For a living person we have a higher standard of referencing. Every fact you assert requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS Fiddle Faddle 10:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
19:35:44, 24 June 2014 review of submission by Thomricci
[edit]I am looking for guidance on my article in terms of notability and content appropriateness. This is my first Wiki article and I would like to create it properly before formal submission. I appreciate all comments. Thomricci (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Thomricci (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Done left comments on your talk page Fiddle Faddle 10:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
