Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 August 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 5 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 7 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 6

[edit]

05:48:02, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Wozamatod

[edit]


I am looking for assistance in regard to this draft I have written. I am a new wikipedia editor, and I came to this site because I found out about this topic and wondered why it wasn't an article on the site. Almost all the sources are from old newspapers. I wanted to know whether I have cited the sources correctly, and the I wanted to set up a few redirects to this article, as there are several names that the article could be called.

thanks Wozamatod (talk) 05:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wozamatod: I have started fixing the bare URLs using Reflinks so reviewers can more easily evaluate the sources. I think the subject will meet general notability. I recommend removing the trivia section and putting that content into appropriate prose sections. Redirects can be made once this submission is accepted so I wouldn't worry about that just yet. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07:49:46, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Amira AbdelMoneim

[edit]


Hello,

I created a new article and submitted it for review on July 19th. It's been almost 3 weeks and I haven't hard back from you?!! Is this normal?? I remember when I first submitted the article to be reviewed. It said that it should take up to 2 weeks?!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Center_for_Advanced_Materials

Amira AbdelMoneim (talk) 07:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined for the reason stated on the draft. Reviews take arbitrary time periods. The volunteers review those they feel they have the skill to assess and help with. Most of us attempt to review the oldest submissions first. Fiddle Faddle 09:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Murarka College, Sultanganj

[edit]

facebook.com/mclgsgginfo www.murarkacollege.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.212.30.141 (talk) 08:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have created Draft:Murarka College, Sultanganj. Is this the item you would like some help with? PLease tell us what help you require. Fiddle Faddle 09:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is to be deleted as a copyright infringement of http://murarkacollege.org/history anyway. Please write in your own words. Fiddle Faddle 09:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:54:40, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Yahadzija

[edit]


Yahadzija (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC) How to displace this article on the main site?[reply]

Yahadzija (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

:I have just declined your draft because Demićka exists. You may edit Demićka. I have left a fuller comment on your draft. Fiddle Faddle 10:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I fouled up and have now unfouled up. The draft has been accepted, and is awaiting a technical move request to be handled by an admin. Fiddle Faddle 10:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10:29:35, 6 August 2014 review of draft by BrightIdeaNI

[edit]


I would like to know how to add images to my article - I also have a table with programme statistics to add. Can you help please, thank you BrightIdeaNI (talk) 10:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New users, which I assume you are, have a sort of probationary period during which picture upload is impossible, so you should concentrate on the draft itself for now. Before going too far with fancy stuff like tables I suggest you bolt the basics into place. Look, please, at WP:42 and also the possibility that your draft is promotional. It;s worth solving these things before worrying about the remainder. You shoudl also choose a different username. Yours is that of an organisation, which is against the rules. It will matter a lot as time passes. I commend Wikipedia:Changing username to you. Fiddle Faddle 11:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is, though, a copyright violation of http://brightideani.com/wordpress/index.php/about-the-programme/ and may not remain here. Articles must be written in your own words. Fiddle Faddle 11:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11:54:59, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Olaniyan Olushola

[edit]

I noticed that i didnt provide a proper link and references. I have therefore done that. Thank youOlaniyan Olushola (talk) 11:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 11:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Olaniyan Olushola: no Declined I moved your submission to Draft:Sikiru Ayinde Barrister so you may remove the redirect on your sandbox. The subject doesn't meet our notability criteria for musicians or general notability. You need to provide better sources like this, this, and this, for starters. Also, it doesn't make sense to make a discography for someone who themselves isn't notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:44:49, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Yahadzija

[edit]


Yahadzija (talk) 16:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

We are going forwards anyway!

Yahadzija (talk) 16:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:59:37, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Zarathuddite

[edit]

When the article was initially reviewed, it was accepted as Start class with two cleanup banners: orphan and more citations needed. I have made edits which I believe address both of those issues, and if so I hope the cleanup banners can be removed. Also, any feedback on other changes I can make to improve the article's grade are much appreciated! Zarathuddite (talk) 16:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Zarathuddite (talk) 16:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone, including you, may make any justifiable edits to articles, banners, classes etc. My personal view on classes is that I wish they were not perceived as so important, and that I would prefer them not to exist. My view is a minority view. If you feel enough work has been done to remove the banner or part of the banner, do so with a good heart. Remember to say what and why in the edit summary.
My preference with articles is that we father them, and move on, not mother them and wrap them in warm towels in case they graze their knees. Fiddle Faddle 17:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will do so.Zarathuddite (talk) 17:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18:30:29, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Yahadzija

[edit]


Yahadzija (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What about my proposal for Pougarje article?

Yahadzija (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me, what proposal? We handle draft articles here, so, if you have such a draft, or wish to start one, got to the task with a will. Fiddle Faddle 20:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18:36:02, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Tgweeze

[edit]

Hello, my draft page for Zeeto Media was recently declined. I couldn't find anything specific as to why it was declined and was wondering if you could please share with me the reasons it was not approved? I attached references as was requested back in June. Any suggestions on what to do next would be really appreciated. I know you guys are busy so I really appreciate any help you can give me. Thank you for your time. Tgweeze (talk) 18:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the answer is that there is nothing that indicates that the org passes WP:CORP. Ii was my hope when I reviewed it back in June that you would also take the opportunity to expand it. Most folk do that automatically, and I apologise for not being specific and suggesting it then. May I suggest you engage Missvain in a conversation to determine their rationale for not accepting? Fiddle Faddle 20:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:23:31, 6 August 2014 review of submission by Chandalier

[edit]

Hi, Sorry if I'm asking this in the wrong place or wasting anyone's time by asking an obvious question with no answer. I know that everyone who reviews articles is volunteering their time and I definitely don't want any special treatment and that it is about waiting until someone with an interest in the area reviews the page. What I wondered was, is there anyway to highlight the categories etc a new article for creation relates to for those who review the articles to help speed up the process/ cut down on wasting other people's time? The article I created (my first, and sorry I think I marked up the references wrong, but couldn't quite work out the right way and have been so busy in the last couple of weeks haven't had a chance to go back and change them) is about a golfer who meets the notability 3, 5 & 6 and I was really surprised she didn't have a page which is why I created one. I thought maybe a reviewer with an interest in women's sport or golf might want to review it, but don't know how to flag it up to them.

Sorry again if this is the wrong place and if you've answered a similar question elsewhere and I've missed it. Thanks for reading! Chandalier (talk) 22:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We don't normally do special requests here, but because the article was so well done, with sources, categories and good formatting, I couldn't resist. Well done! Sionk (talk) 23:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_August_6&oldid=1104089212"