Help desk
< February 29	<< Feb \| March \| Apr >>	March 2 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

March 1

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phosphonium Coupling

the article has been revised accordingly based on all suggestions and comments. when can it be approved? thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatwall2000 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a backlog of pending submission but I'm sure it will be reviewed shortly. I had a quick look and was immidiate struck by the immense number of footnotes (which I found rather overwhelming), you might want to read over the essay Wikipedia:Citation overkill. All the best, France3470 (talk) 04:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How to delete a not yet reviewed article?

Hi,

I want to remove this draft article. There is not enough help to develop this at this time.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for Creation/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bogoda_Premaratne

URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bogoda_Premaratne

Thank you. JC (talk) 05:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have put it in for speedy deletion. A412 (Talk • C) 06:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/XOXO The Mag

Wikipedia talk:Articles for Creation/Sema Ece Toker Hi, I created a talk for the magazine called XOXO The Mag, and I added reliable references and citations from the related sources on the web. I did everything after the reviews and suggestions. Therefore could you please explain the specific reason for not being published? Thank you. Semaecetoker (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since two of your sources are just image galleries and the third is the XOXO website, the problem is that you don't have any reliable, independent sources discussing the magazine in detail. If you can add those and resubmit, that would be great. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 14:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

artictle for creation Jim Ronayne

i resummited my article for creation(Jim Ronayne) last Sunday 26/o2/2012 and i am wondering when it will be reviewed.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dublin1983 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would estimate another 2-3 days. We have quite a back log at this time. I checked your article quickly and it looks much better, however the Wikipedia can not be used as a reference. Perhaps you can find another reliable reference for some of your items, remove them, or leave them without a citation at this time, with the possibility they may be deleted. :- ) DCS 18:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Indus Creations

Hello folks after following multipe reviews on this articles (and multiple reworded submissions) we still find that the last user went back to the "notability" point At this point there is nothing more we can share about the group. There are over 500 "real" people that follow this theater group on our facebook page www.Facebook.com/IndusCreations

There has been articles about us in MSN! What else are we needing to be more notable?

Any meaningful help here is much appreciated so we can publish this article.

Thanks.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govenkat (talk • contribs) 20:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From my comment, "Sorry, but the references just don't prove notability. Those are press releases which come from the India syndicate. Its like an Op-ed. These claims of blockbuster and such are unsupported and do not meet criteria. The blog review doesn't count either. Nor do their event calendar or their website." Please read the WP:Notability specifically Wikipedia:Notability (music). None of the 12 criteria are listed for musicians and ensembles. If you can cite at least one of those then it should qualify. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another specific note: If you can't find one of those then it probably shouldn't have an article on Wikipedia. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edward Margolies

I am, anew User and have created an entry for Edward Margolies. At the top of the page I have created it is says "This is a draft Articles for Creation submission. It is not currently pending review." Then at the bottom of the page it says: "Review pending. This submission is waiting to be reviewed. This might take several days. There are currently 372 submissions waiting for review at this page."

I am not sure whether or not I have done everything I need to do because top of the page says the article is not currently pending review and the bottom of the page say Review Pending. Can you clarify this for me? I would likek to submit the article. Do I need to do anything further to submit the article.

Thank for your help.

Thecobbrooklyn (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted it for you. A412 (Talk • C) 23:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]