User talk:Greatwall2000
Hi ChzzBot IV, I have been trying to get approval for my article. I revised it several times based on other reviewers' comments, such as adding inline references, directing the technical terms to their wikipedia definitions, showing its applications with various related references, and using non-technical texts to describe this entry. Would you be able to review it again and approve it? This is a new exciting methodology in chemistry that is becoming more useful and popular in recent years since its discovery in 2004. Thank all of your voluntary work to make this a great open free encyclopedia. I hope I can join you to make it better. Sincerely, Greatwall2000
========================
[edit]thank you very much! i am learning and having fun with it. i appreciate you help and please point out any obvious errors shown in the article. i look forward to its approval into wikipedia soon. thanks!!!
Welcome
[edit]Hi, Greatwall2000. Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!
For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.
Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 05:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phosphonium Coupling. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.
Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.
Here's an example of how to add references:
He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>
== References ==
{{reflist}}
That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.
Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.
Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 05:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phosphonium Coupling.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) DCS 07:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phosphonium Coupling.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phosphonium Coupling.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —SW— spill the beans 15:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Invitation
[edit]
|
Hello! Greatwall2000,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.