Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Territorial change of China
Appearance
- Reason
- I think this is a good EV picture
- Articles this image appears in
- History of China, China, Ancient history
- Creator
- Pojanji
- Time Requirement
- Been in History of China for a month [1]
- Image Page Traffic Statistics
- March 2009
- Support as nominator --—Chris! ct 22:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I would suggest trying this at FPC. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 02:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently not. But I would have voted for it. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 02:55, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, this deserved to be a FP, imo. But the FP regulars are a bit picky, though. That's why I try VP first.—Chris! ct 18:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - I noticed that there were concerns regarding its factual accuracy during the FPC; have these been addressed? –Juliancolton | Talk 20:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think the factual concern is referring to the purposed caption, not the image. As far as I know, this image is pretty accurate.—Chris! ct 21:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, the concern was regarding this description used for the Featured picture nomination, "China was under dynastic rule from the Xia Dynasty (2070 - 1600 BCE) until the collapse the Qing Dynasty and the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1912." The image appears to be accurate. VX!talk 05:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think the factual concern is referring to the purposed caption, not the image. As far as I know, this image is pretty accurate.—Chris! ct 21:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support, ON THE CONDITION that the dates are accurate. Have they been verified? It seems a smidge fast, and there are some funny little dots on the coastline, but it's certainly a great educational tool. J Milburn (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, the quality can definitely be improved upon, but this is a great image as far as educational value is concerned.—Chris! ct 03:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
More reviews, please. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support - The quality could be improved upon, but it's highly encyclopedic and informative, so I'm willing to overlook the minor issues. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 15:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)