Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 2:Cards/Approved/WP:LEW

Lamest Edit War

• Name of card: Lamest Edit War
• Class: Vandalism
• Text: Make an article go back to start-class (and try to be more mature next time; ( btw Dilophosaurus does have a "ph".)
• User access level: ANY
• Proposed by: CanvasHat 21:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Image comments

Image - Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Good! I like the picture. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 23:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Quote suggestions

Extended content

Try to be mor mature next time; Dilophosaurus does have a ph and doesn't need to link to itself or Try to be more mature next time; Dilophosaurus doesn't spit poison,and Jurassic Park isn't a very good source --CanvasHat 11:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC) Possibly, although I would love a better one. Is there a source for this? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 19:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC) The top of my head, so I guess that would make that me? And Dilophosaurus never had a LEW, it's just fun to say.--CanvasHat 17:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC) I think that we should try to use things that are actually quotes from somewhere, like all of the other quote ideas for other cards. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 05:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC) An actual quote: "Occasionally, even experienced Wikipedians lose their heads and devote every waking moment to edit warring over the most trivial thing." Is it too long? —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs) 22:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC) I think that it is fantastic, as long as it fits. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 23:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC) It leaves about 3 lines for the text, so we'd probably have to shorten one or the other. —Preceding signed comment added by Nicky Nouse (talk • contribs) 05:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC) Surely the specified special text won't take up more than two lines...sounds good to me. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 01:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Comments from the card's original proposal
Seems fine to me. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 03:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC) I lol'd and support. Great idea. I'd like to propose the additional text "May not be reverted or rolled back" if y'all like that, seeing as how that would violate the 3-revert policy. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 00:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)