Wikipedia:Trading card game/Action plan/Phase 1:Rules

Rulesets

First and foremost we need to decide on a set of rules, otherwise we can't really continue with the project. A poll has been suggested.

Please sign your name under your preferred rules. You may !vote for only one set of rules (you may change your !vote if you wish). You may propose a new set of rules by creating a new subpage (titled Wikipedia talk:Trading card game/Rules proposal NUMBER HERE) and listing it here. As a general rule, you should not vote your own proposal; let others share their opinion about it.

Right now, a closing date for the poll hasn't been set; this was tried before but there weren't enough !votes to establish consensus. If sufficient participation is met, a closing date would be set. Then again, this poll is more of a guide: discussion (and thus consensus) may drift towards one set of rules or another; perhaps elements from various rulesets could be incorporated into the base set.

Proposal 1 (Discuss)

The simplest, easiest, and (IMO) most fun Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal 2 (Discuss)

I vote for this proposal!--Ratón Bat ^{Talk 2 me!!} 00:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like the best idea. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 00:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Abce2 (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
this is the easyest to understand rdunn albatross 13:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My personal fave -- AquaTeen13 (talk)]] 21:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although I have encountered some concerns regarding encourgment of vandalism, it seems like the best idea as of right now, and I don't seriously think if some kid plays this game they will be encourged to vandalize.. ⊕Assasin Joe ^talk 21:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This proposal is epic win--Capybara123 (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like this one. alexzabbey (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Best one. Canvashat (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Some dense rules, but definitely the winner.Biohazard388 (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely the best. Would still need more work for the finished product, but this one is definitely in the right direction. Hi878 (talk) 03:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal 3 (Discuss)

I like the idea of it. Raiku : Chat 08:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal 4 (Discuss)
Proposal 5 (Discuss)

--Yowuza yadderhouse |meh 17:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal 6 (Discuss)
Proposal 7 (Discuss)

Individual rules/ideas/concepts

Given that several users have proposed, at the project's talk page, several ideas for the game that have not been integrated into a ruleset but instead remain as standalone rules, another poll, simultaneous to the rulesets one, has been started. You may show your support or oppose for a particular idea/rule by signing your name under the appropriate section. You may support/oppose as many rules as you wish. You may change your !vote(s). As in the ruleset poll, you should not support-!vote your own idea; let others share their opinion about it.

The purpose of this poll is to reach consensus on particular, individual ideas that have been suggested (so that they don't go unnoticed). The ruleset(s) with more support from the poll above, which would be used as base, would have to later incorporate/give significant consideration to the individual concepts that have met community approval in this poll.

If you have thought of a gameplay idea but have not developed an entire set of rules out of it, you may list your idea here for consideration. Additionally, ideas mentioned at the talk page but not formally proposed will be probably moved here.