Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 October 21

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HOPL-lang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Citation template only used on one page, but even more important, the link does not lead to where it should and the website has a "not secure" warning on my browser. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Silverlink color

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Silverlink color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions of this rail-related template. Possibly orphaned during an upgrade of affected pages to use Module:Adjacent stations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Silverlink is long defunct. Mackensen (talk) 19:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being defunct is not a reason for deletion. We do have e.g. {{LBSCR colour}}, {{LSWR colour}} and dozens more for defunct railway companies. They are used for historical services. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template: Foreign relations of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foreign relations of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template should be deleted as soon as possible right now. Most of the articles on it were permanently deleted earlier. As shown here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan–Chechnya_relations&action=edit&redlink=1 and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Georgia–Ichkeria_relations&action=edit&redlink=1. The Template was created by the banned user and sock puppet of ArsenalAthleticio2017 named [User:Relahs]. So why keep this Template. Delete this template as well as the article for Estonia above. Period. YDMCFreshMeadows192 talk 14:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep for multiple reasons:
Number 1: there have been significant contributions since then by users who were NOT blocked/banned. So the speedy deletion point is moot.
Number 2: the nomination was itself made by a sockpuppet of a blocked/banned LTA. Which means WP:SKCRIT applies.
And number 3: the rationale of “most of the articles on it were permanently deleted earlier” is completely wrong. There are only three red links on that template.

Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 21:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; seems like a useful navbox. Should be added to the articles it links to per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. Cremastra (u — c) 22:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Geert Wilders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 October 28. ✗plicit 23:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geert_Wilders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games event

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 October 28. ✗plicit 23:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox_Asian_Indoor_and_Martial_Arts_Games_event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women Group tables

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women Group tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament uses different tables. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Highest points of Africa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (u — c) 20:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Highest points of Africa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see the point of having a template for every "highest mountain top in xxx place" conceivable Graywalls (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It provides a way for readers to navigate between the highest points of the various sovereign states of continents. These templates also exist for the Canadian highpoints, US highpoints, and other continents. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 02:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made the African, North American, and South American templates because Europe, Asia, and Oceania already had pre-existing highpoint templates. If those continents had templates it stands to reason that Africa and the Americas should as well. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 02:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep – as a highpoint template would be VERY useful. I don’t see conceivability to be a good enough rationale. Especially if everyone works on it. If anything; we need to be creating more highpoint templates; not getting rid of them! I think maybe we should make one for state/territory high points in the United States. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 01:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait.. just realized. There already is. And it’s very useful. I use it; I’m sure a lot of folks use it. We should be making more templates like that. Maybe start thinking about high points in Canadian provinces (already done) and Mexican states for instance as well. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 01:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep, seems no worse than Template:Highest points of South America and we don't seem to be considering all of them. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:R tagged automatically

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 November 4. Izno (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R_tagged_automatically (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.