Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 February 9
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Navigation template used only on a draft article which appears to be a hoax. All links are either red or link to unrelated pages (probably because the template was copied from {{Nazism sidebar}}). Omphalographer (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Usgovtext (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Significantly limited in functionality compared to Template:US government sources. Should be deleted as redundant. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 17:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I've just replaced the 3 transclusions manually. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 11:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Please note (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I'm not sure that I see a single appropriate use of this template:
- User talk:AugustusAudax uses this template for giving information and linking to a related page, not for directing the user to a different page they were looking for. Arguably, the idea that a hatnote can also "serve as [...] a notice template", as stated in the documentation, is contrary to the hatnote guideline.
- Template:Welcome-turnaround/doc uses the template at the bottom of the page, not the top, so it isn't being used to generate an actual hatnote according to the guideline's definition. It also isn't being used to direct the user to a different page.
- Wikipedia:Information suppression does correctly use the template in accordance with the hatnote guideline; however, as the page is already tagged with {{historical}}, the added emphasis of "Please note:" is unnecessary. {{For}} can be used instead in this case.
PleaseStand (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think it would be easier to turn this normal template into a substituted one, so that it could serve as a useful shortcut. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 15:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Pointless. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The South East Queensland Stars last played in 2016. Therefore, a current roster isn't needed anymore. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
All red links. DB1729talk 03:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep' There is now a blue link but yes the purpose of the template was in part to indicate at least some of the articles we should have on this subject.©Geni (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- *Delete per WP:NENAN. No objection to userfication if the intention is to create the red linked articles at some point. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Only one article now. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.