Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 14

< March 13	March 15 >

March 14

Template:S-line/EuroCity left/95

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/EuroCity left/95 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/EuroCity right/95 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RE-BY right/20 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused s-line templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Texas legislative districts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Texas state legislative districts. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:40, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Texas legislative districts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and two other templates, Template:Texas state legislative districts and Template:TXSenDist, are used in this template's space. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I will redirect to Template:Texas state legislative districts. Moondragon21 (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ternopil Raion (former)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ternopil Raion (former) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Three links and unused. Replaced by Template:Ternopil Oblast. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:StarTrek.com link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:StarTrek.com link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template has been broken for 3 years now. If this can't be fixed it should be deleted. Also, if possible, a bot or AWB run to remove the commented out usages which read:  (see Fury (Star Trek: Voyager)). Gonnym (talk) 16:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have no idea how the site looked previously and I'm too lazy to visit the Wayback Machine, but it doesn't appear like the content is available anymore and fixing the link isn't possible. If you or anyone else want a link template to be fixed feel free to drop me a line. --Trialpears (talk) 19:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please consider filing a WP:URLREQ. Izno Public (talk) 01:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete or rewrite, it looks like the content is still there [1] and [2] but there is no way to translate the old URLs to new URLs, so all of the links would need to be updated by hand, so I created {{StarTrek.com}} and updated all the episode articles. Frietjes (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Liga Bolasepak Rakyat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Liga Bolasepak Rakyat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox full of non notable teams, redirects and red links. Transcluded only in four places, one of which is up for deletion as well. Ajf773 (talk) 09:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC) Ajf773 (talk) 09:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all redlinks that are not notable enough for articles. Therefore, template is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Avilich (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 19:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not needed. Giant Snowman 19:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021–22 NCAA Division II men's basketball conference season navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2021–22 NCAA Division II men's basketball conference season navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox containing only redlinks. No navigation purposes served. SportsGuy789 (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).