Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 10

March 10

Template:Script/BMP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:Script/BMP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Script/SMP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Not relevant any more. Distracts from good script-to-font handling. No reason to support unused 'IE6-support' templates. Not maintained/tested. See also: Category:MSIE font fix templates (0) and MSIE 6 (2002–2016). DePiep (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Added: {{Script/SMP}}. -DePiep (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Noted on WP:VPT ([1]) -DePiep (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - According to this only 0.01% of people worldwide are still using IE 6 so deleting these may inconvenience those people however it seems stupid supporting a browser that pretty much died 10 years ago. –Davey2010^Talk 00:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
• We no longer serve to IE6 at all because it does not support TLS 1.2. --Izno (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  ... hence the template is clearly useless. Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Wordify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 19. Primefac (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

• Module:Wordify (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Div DC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:Div DC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{div DC}} outputs </div></div> to close two div's which were opened in different ways. Example use [2] by the template creator:

{{Div flex row}}
<div>
...
{{div DC}}

It looks like there is an open <div>. It makes the wikitext confusing to editors and tools. Tags should be opened and closed in the same or similar way for source readability. The creator also made {{Div flex row}} with documentation to close it with </div>. I made {{Div flex row end}} and changed the documentation [3] and all uses with a </div> close. I suggest {{div DC}} is deleted and the 18 current uses are replaced with code matching the opening divs it closed, e.g. for the above example:

{{Div flex row}}
<div>
...
</div>
{{Div flex row end}}

PrimeHunter (talk) 14:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Overly complex. Nigej (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
• There are a couple others of this particular nature in Category:Wikipedia_XHTML_tag-replacing_templates that could perhaps use a deletion. --Izno (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
• delete, makes it harder to see if the div tags are matched. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RWS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Speedy close, wrong venue, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:RWS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete and unused. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 14:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

• Wrong venue Redirects go to RfD, not TfD. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chilean Social Outbreak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 18. Izno (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

• Template:Chilean_Social_Outbreak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).