Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 21

< June 20	June 22 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Björn Rosenström (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

None of the albums listed in this navbox have an article. Provides no useful navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete, provides no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cyclingresult-men

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cyclingresult-men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template - originally created by a user, now community banned. Redundant to Template:Cyclingresult. Craig (talk) 22:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Text: This Account has been inactive for a long time, the user maybe stoped using the account

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Text: This Account has been inactive for a long time, the user maybe stoped using the account (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not useful or used. We already have {{Not around}}. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just text with no function. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, looks like something created by mistake. Frietjes (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy G2 as a test page which only contains someone's broken attempt at playing around with AM boxes. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 12:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox 2012 Villaggio Mall fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox 2012 Villaggio Mall fire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No need for a separate template, should be substituted and deleted. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 18:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
subst and delete, better to keep with the article. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2020 U Sports Templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2020 AUS football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2020 CWUAA football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2020 OUA football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2020 RSEQ football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The 2020 U Sports football season was cancelled because of the pandemic, so the concept of there be standings is moot because there were no games played. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 23:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Airline fleet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airline fleet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an unused template that hasn't been edited since 2008. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 23:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:K-Love Fan Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:K-Love Fan Awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not currently useful - every link redirects to the same article. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not useful for navaigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

OHL Templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. For the record, this absolutely should have been a move followed by an WP:R2 speedy deletion request. This TFD should not be seen as any sort of precedent, but listing what is clearly an R2 candidate at RFD is a waste of time and effort, which is why I'll be deleting them. Primefac (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2019-20 OHL standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2019-20 OHL playoffs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2020-21 OHL standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These are not templates nor were created as templates to begin with. Instead, they redirect to sections in the respective articles or to the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue Template redirects to to RfD, not TfD * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete regardless of the venue. Not useful and not a template. Gonnym (talk) 17:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wrong venue, template redirects are discussed at RfD. Frietjes (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 IFL standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. For the record, this absolutely should have been a move followed by an R2 speedy deletion request. This TFD should not be seen as any sort of precedent, but listing what is clearly an R2 candidate at RFD is a waste of time and effort, which is why I'll be deleting them. Primefac (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2021 IFL standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Same as the OHL templates nominated below. Isn't a template nor was created as one. Instead, redirects to the standings section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue Template redirects go to RfD, not TfD * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No need for WP:BURO. This (and the other) templates were recently subst into articles and for some strange reason, turned into a redirect. In any standard discussion here, a single-use template would have been subst and deleted. This is nothing special. Even if the venue is incorrect, it has already been listed, commented, and relisted. WP:BURO is a policy for a reason and it supersedes RfD guidelines. Gonnym (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wrong venue, template redirects are discussed at RfD. Frietjes (talk) 23:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:West Balikpapan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:West Balikpapan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not useful - articles for the subdistricts do not exist. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No navagational purpose. I think Template:Balikpapan and Template:East Balikpapan should be considered for a Tfd as well. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OCD MP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OCD MP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary to have a template to save a couple of words of text. Should be substituted and deleted. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing to substitute from this page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedians having been offered adoption progress

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedians having been offered adoption progress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is used only at Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. As the category does not have monthly sub-categories, there is no need for this template, as the category already displays the number of pages in it. Gonnym (talk) 08:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not necessary. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 15:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cartography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Cartography topics. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cartography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cartography topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Cartography with Template:Cartography topics.
Both templates cover the history of cartography. Onceinawhile (talk) 07:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support No need for two templates for the same topic. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Naftalan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Naftalan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Empty navbox for a single town of about 10,000 people. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Empty template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, provides insufficient useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Henry Danger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Henry Danger (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two links; even if we add the episode and character lists, which we shouldn't, still not enough to support this being a template. Need at least 12 links for a template or category to be useful. Everything is additionally linked in the parent article itself, so there's no real value in this. So this should be deleted. Amaury • 00:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough articles exist as of yet for there to be a template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Kind of pointless with this few links. Already linked in more appropriate places in the main article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator, not enough articles to warrant the template at all. — YoungForever^(talk) 00:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).