Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 April 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 12 April 14 >

April 13

[edit]

Template:8TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis577

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaced by {{8TeamBracket|compact=y|sets=5/7/7}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Badfish

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, bring it up at WP:MFD (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 07:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template with no ostensible purpose, no tracking categories, adds no value to the artist nor to Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle 20:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Procdural close Userboxes (regardless of namespace) are supposed to be discussed at MfD. That said since these are harmless "This user is a fan of musician X" type boxes they should all just be userfied because they don't really belong in template space, per WP:UM and WP:UBXNS. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Eminem

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, bring it up at WP:MFD (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 07:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template with no ostensible purpose, no tracking categories, adds no value to the artist nor to Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle 20:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Carly Rae Jepsen Fan

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, bring it up at WP:MFD (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 07:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template with no ostensible purpose, no tracking categories, adds no value to the artist nor to Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle 20:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue, this appears to be a userbox and should be nominated at Wikipedia:MFD. Also @No Men Are Allowed You should read Wikipedia:WAX as that is an argument to generally avoid in deletion discussions. Aasim (talk) 05:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Miley Cyrus Fan

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, bring it up at WP:MFD (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 07:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template with no ostensible purpose, no tracking categories, adds no value to the artist nor to Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue, this appears to be a userbox and should be nominated at Wikipedia:MFD. Also @No Men Are Allowed You should read Wikipedia:WAX as that is an argument to generally avoid in deletion discussions. Aasim (talk) 05:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tag Team (group)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All content redirected except for one single and album, leaving this far short of WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:De minimis

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 01:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used template. Most free images are uploaded to Commons anyway, so... Aasim (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's needed to standardize the few instances that need it, usually in preparation for uploading to Commons. If or when the image is imported to Commons, having the same template helps to preserve the work that went into establishing the rationale. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 04:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep useful for consistency with Commons. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It has its uses in free files, which we don't always transfer to Commons for various reasons. It can also be used on semi-free files (such as {{PD-USonly}}) that can't be hosted on Commons. Lastly, all kinds of non-free files could use it, like {{Photo of art}} and simply things like File:RockPaperShotgunWebsite.png this. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Has a use in general, and could be useful for when a file should be uploaded here instead of Commons. But I would note that by using the template de minimis or de minimis non curat lex meaning "The law does not concern itself with trifles", we are essentially saying that the file is free but contains a non-free element, however its use is so trivial it would not be considered copyright infringement, and thus its freeness would not be inhibited, so this should not really be used on non-free files. Dylsss(talk contribs) 23:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_April_13&oldid=1019086457"