Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 24
March 24
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Setanta Sports Cup 2006 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Setanta Sports Cup 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unnecessary since it is used on only one page and duplicates information provided on the page. Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Steven (Editor) (talk) 23:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 13:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep as-is, with no prejudice towards the normal practice of editing a template to change it (e.g. converting to a wrapper). Primefac (talk) 04:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox FBI Ten Most Wanted (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox criminal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox FBI Ten Most Wanted with Template:Infobox criminal.
What is someone on the FBI Ten Most Wanted list if not a criminal? Also, FBI Ten Most Wanted leaves something to be desired with regard to parameter options. It is used for a lot of former fugitives on whose article pages the template's transclusion creates what I'd argue is WP:UNDUE. Jay D. Easy (talk) 04:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose, a wanted person is not a criminal. Therefore, any use of infobox criminal should be removed unless the subject is convicted. Christian75 (talk) 15:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- oppose per Christian75. however, we really should refactor to use {{infobox person}} on the backend, like we did for {{infobox criminal}}, or create a separate "FBI Ten Most Wanted" module that can be inserted into {{infobox person}} boxes. Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The FBI list is a notable categorization, and it's separate from "criminal" as Christian mentioned. Any undue usage is a problem of editing, not the list. SteveStrummer (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 1. Primefac (talk) 05:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Goalscorers. Note that usage of {{GoalsPerMatch}} seems to be followed by content that could be folded into a (proper) usage of {{Goalscorers}}. Primefac (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:GoalsPerMatch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Goalscorers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:GoalsPerMatch with Template:Goalscorers.
Similar sentence and usage in both templates. We can add 0 as default after merging. Hhkohh (talk) 14:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. GiantSnowman 13:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Template is essentially the same as Template:Nepal national football team. GERNPL (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- delete per nom Hhkohh (talk) 14:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 13:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Bromalayan (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Film series navigation box with no useful navigation left. All but one of the film articles have been deleted or redirected to the parent. • Gene93k (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I recall that Neelix made a whole bunch of inappropriate redirects around this barely notblable topic we had to clean up. Glad to see the clean up continue. Legacypac (talk) 07:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).