Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 11 February 13 >

February 12

[edit]

METRA templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All-caps redirects to the Metra family of s-line templates. Unused since December 2006. Mackensen (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AtlantaCensusPop

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one transclusion, in Demographics of Atlanta. No foreseeable future use in other articles. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian Rules Football Salary Caps

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion, in AFL salary cap. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

More Amtrak s-line templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Amtrak s-line templates; a mixture of prior deprecation and replacement by Module:Adjacent stations/Amtrak. Mackensen (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Meso Labelled Map

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No article-space transclusions. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DetroitCensusPop

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TV program order

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The only possible use of this succession box falls foul of WP:NOTTVGUIDE. It should be deleted and all uses removed from all articles. --woodensuperman 16:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, this template provides some knowledge of the drama serials that precede and succeed the drama. If we delete it we will have to figure these out ourselves, and I don't think it clicks for us. The Chinese Wikipedia has been having this, so why can't we? 2679D (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Because this is WP:NOT what Wikipedia is for. --woodensuperman 09:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Amtrak

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template wraps {{Amtrak stations}}. It's a copy of {{Amtk}} except that it does not support one parameter (|dab=). It could be redirected to {{Amtk}} with no loss in functionality, but there seems little purpose in having multiple ways to wrap the same template, especially when that template can also simply be called directly. There are fifteen transclusions in total, and about half of them are because the template is discussed in various bits of template documentation. This name would also seem a good candidate for an Amtrak navigational template, which we don't currently have. Mackensen (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation navboxes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTTVGUIDE. --woodensuperman 16:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vol. 4 (Black Sabbath album)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting this template as it has no value. While this album achieved Silver and Platinum certifications and is notable, but only two songs have their own pages, which just shows that it is not THAT notable. – Sabbatino (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FNBSD Branches

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Constituencies in Lebanon

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Citizenship of Iceland

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Abhisit Cabinet

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 06:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2007 in Australian television templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Each of these has one transclusion, and all in 2007 in Australian television. However, these templates have no use outside of their sole transclusions in that page. Substitute and delete all. Steel1943 (talk) 05:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Greenleft-electionresults

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UN budget

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Steel1943 (talk) 05:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sheotherawards

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No article-space transclusions. Also, the template doesn't seem like it could be placed in any existing articles. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Longest lived Atlantic tropical cyclones

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kuwait parliamentary election, 2008

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another election tempate with one transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of Registered Historic Places in Florida topnav

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per my rationale at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 29. Having a clickable map's code on a separate page is a good way to prevent unintentional damage. It could very easily be edited by accident, and the detailed nature of the code means that you won't easily notice that you made a little change by accident. As a result, it's good to ensure that image maps be edited only by people who intend to edit them. Moreover, the size of this page is significantly more than the size of the page where it's transcluded; someone intending to edit the non-map part of the article would need to go more than halfway down the page, and that increases the chance that you'll unwittingly hit another key (and thus damage the page) while pressing PageDown. Nyttend (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Las Meninas

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No article-space transclusions. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SHL Labelled Map

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Map template with no transclusions. Steel1943 (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Liga Leumit Map 2007-08

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Germanic diachronic

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 20. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Detainee names

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion ... of a few lines of text. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party political make-up of Croydon Council

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KvS Scoreboard

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kyiv election, 2008 templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion each. Substitute and delete both. Steel1943 (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree; at the time I made them I thought they would be featured on more then 1 page (for example on Kiev City Council).... but this did not happen and local elections have taken place in Kyiv since 2008 anyway.... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For your convenience I substituted both templates in (Wikipedia article) 2008 Kiev local election just now. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yulia Romero: Thanks! Does that means at this point, you are okay with these templates being deleted? Steel1943 (talk) 00:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes (I am). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 14:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
...Well, in response, I was then planning on marking these both for WP:G7 speedy deletion, but both of the templates have several other editors who have edited them over the years, so IMO, the speedy deletions would not be valid. Guess we'll just have to wait it out. Steel1943 (talk) 14:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Albanian asylum

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asian American Electoral votes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No article-space transclusions. However, this information may not be present in Asian Americans or some other related page. But even then, this template can be substituted. Delete in lieu of placing the information into any article. Steel1943 (talk) 04:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asian American income by ethnic group

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No article-space transclusions. The information in this template is most likely present somewhere in Asian Americans. Either way, this template uses outdated 2003 statistics. Delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asian American education

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No article-space transclusions. Seems to be superseded by a chart at Asian Americans#Education. Delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Progress in future enlargement of the European Union

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The objections are not really valid. Keeping code a table in a separate template just so that it can be edited separately is not a valid reason for a template. A template is supposed to be reusable. There is no reason to reuse this thus no reason for a template. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion, clearly exclusive to the article which it is transcluded. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Military of Sri Lanka2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Transcludes Template:Infobox national military with fields filled out per the aforementioned template's instruction, so this being a standalone template wrapper is unnecessary. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asian American numbers in Metropolitan areas

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mass fraction table

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion, as well as a misleading name since it seems to apply specifically to the subject at Rocket. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete Linked from Rocket where it is preceded by "Some notable mass fractions are found in the following table (some aircraft are included for comparison purposes):" giving the impression that this its only possible use. Nigej (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Devonian graphical timeline

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 20. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pew2013 and friends

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pew2002 and Template:Pew2007 have 0 transclusions. They both seem superseded by Template:Pew2013, which has only one transclusion. The information in Template:Pew2013 would probably be best as a substituted chart in the article which it is located, and can be updated whenever the newest year of information changes in the future. Delete Template:Pew2002 and Template:Pew2007. Substitute and delete Template:Pew2013. Steel1943 (talk) 03:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst 2013 and Delete all three - per nom. Despite the names, the templates only relate to views on homosexuality, in 2002, 2007 and 2013. The 2013 template is used once and supersedes the other two. As noted, a substituted table could readily be updated as required. Nigej (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Argentina's IRB world ranking

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 03:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Hampshire Union Leader Institutional Pedigree Chart

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was convert to SVG. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 07:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. The code can safely remain in the article which it is transcluded. The template namespace is primarily intended for templates intended to be used multiple times and/or substituted on multiple occasions. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is there another namespace it could be moved to then? I spent a good ten hours or so researching and putting the diagram together, creating it as a table so that source referencing would work properly, and the whole thing was immediately reverted. My experience with thoroughly researched code-intensive content being moved from a template and dumped into articles is completely the opposite of that being a "safe" procedure, in fact what usually happens is that the editors willing to delete thoroughly-referenced content with the flick of a wrist, who would not normally go to the effort to click through to a template, immediately start hacking this sort of thing away piece by piece and thereby cranking their edit counts up as soon as it's more directly deletable with less effort. I would gladly have made this an SVG image and put it on Commons, and thereby have avoided the casual deletionist problem, but then the referencing wouldn't work. --▸₷truthious Ⓑandersnatch◂ 13:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes 1900–2010

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Seems to have been superseded by Template:Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes. Steel1943 (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I guess we don't need two very similar infobox templates, but the supposed replacement is deeply flawed by not adjusting USD damage amounts to inflation. That makes the numbers incomparable. --bender235 (talk) 12:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to Template talk:Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes § Damage cost figures
@Bender235: Yes, they would be incorrect considering a US government agency that happens to be the RSMC for the Atlantic posted an official inflation adjusted list that differs with the inflation template. In this case, the NHC is what we need to go with. NoahTalk 21:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(Collapsed discussion moved to ensure that this discussion regarding Template:Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes does not get lost here, and can continue on the most pertaining talk page if need be.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_12&oldid=885315430"