Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Footballstats. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Pro-football-reference with Template:Footballstats.
Template:Pro-football-reference (209 transclusions), ought to be merged into the more comprehensive Template:Footballstats (1,640 transclusions), as the later arrays links for individual players at Pro-Football-Reference.com with those at other definitive statistics sites like NFL.com and ESPN.com. Jweiss11 (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A similar template {{Cr-BPL}} was deleted by discussion a few months ago. These are similar templates created and should be deleted for the same reason. Human (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus in prior deletion discussions and at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-salvageable POV, not in use Ymblanter (talk) 12:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Was intended to be included in Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 4#Template:Albany Empire roster navbox but the nominator forgot to list it there. The deletion nomination was "The Arena Football League has folded, so current roster templates are no longer applicable." I have no opinion on this matter. MER-C 10:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hopeless POV Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hopeless POV, the first edit of this user. Ymblanter (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).