Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 29

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Tltts. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Tltts3 with Template:Tltts.
Basically the same besides Template:Tltts3 allows for one more parameter then Template:Tltts We can just allow Template:Tltts to take one more parameter, no need for a separate template. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 23:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zazpot: I don't think so:
{{tltts3}}: {{subst:Example|This is an example for tltts3}}
{{tltts/sandbox}}:

{{subst:Example|Parameter1|Parameter2|parmeter3}}

{{tltts}}: {{subst:Example|Parameter1|Parameter2}}
{{tltts/sandbox}}

{{subst:Example|Parameter1|Parameter2}}

– BrandonXLF (t@lk) 21:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too soon for a navbox. Doesn't aid in navigation cymru.lass (talkcontribs) 23:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template is designed to create wikilinks to American Horror Story character articles (e.g. List of American Horror Story: Murder House characters, American Horror Story: Asylum characters). Redundant to normal wikilinks (so TfD no.2). Harder for new editors to understand than wikilinks. No transclusions in mainspace. TedEdwards 19:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC) Btw. I've made enough redirects so that redirects as long as [[List of American Horror Story: Murder House characters#Vivien Harmon|Vivien Harmon]], for example, aren't necessary anymore, only [[Vivien Harmon]] is necessary. I'm saying this as I believe the intended purpose of the template was to make these links shorter to type. TedEdwards 19:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC) There was also a template here before that was deleted as the result of a discussion here. Looking at the source text before it was deleted (see User:TedEdwards/sandbox8), it served the same purpose as the template now, the only difference being that the old template only linked to List of American Horror Story characters, when all the character bios were there rather than at separate articles for each season. TedEdwards 15:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Would also like to point out (even tough this isn't a criteria for deletion) that the creator of this template choose a template name that doesn't make clear what it does and added no documentation. Not only is this template hard for new editors to understand, it's hard for even editors with experience and the net-gain is almost non existent. Creating a one time redirect is much more smoother. --Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date; current squad is in the article Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; second place squad Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

all redlinks or redirects Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary single-use template Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Asian Games team roster templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after being merged with the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Asian Games men's handball game templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after being merged with the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Asian Games women's handball game templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after being merged with the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 16:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Invictus Games wheelchair rugby templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a template for every 2018 Invictus Games wheelchair rugby match, nor a template to list the templates. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed in the template namespace. The module namespace I understand, but not needed as a template. The function of this can be easily done with using [[File:file|...]]. It only has 6 transclusions and was created late 2014. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 02:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G3 by GB fan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 21:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant vandalism that cannot be used in any Wikipedia project. Really not needed. --Nutty Talk! 15:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion G3 Blatant vandalism. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 19:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).