Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 4

< March 3	March 5 >

March 4

Template:Human prehistory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Human prehistory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Startnowrap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. 28bytes (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Startnowrap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete duplicates an existing template in the nowrap template system -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 07:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete unused; redundant to {{nowrap begin}} -- Gadget850^talk 11:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox tram network/body

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox tram network/body (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History subcategory see-also

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History subcategory see-also (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

overly complicated template for only two categories. Frietjes (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete unused -- Gadget850^talk 11:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sammi Cheng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sammi Cheng (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

currently only connects two articles, Sammi Cheng and Sammi Cheng discography. the rest are redirects. Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a bunch of articles were redirected on 1 March 2015. I find it surprising that there would be no articles on any Sammi Cheng material, considering her fame. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 07:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- None of the albums had any sources and contained nothing more than track listings, so they now redirect to the discography page, which also has no sources, unfortunately. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AtariAge company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 22. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AtariAge title

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AtariAge title (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Citation template that is just a shortened version of cite web used in three articles. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Please see my comments above Template:AtariAge company; they apply here too. This template makes List of Atari 2600 games and related articles easier to maintain. 28bytes (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
On further review, you are correct. It will allow the article link to remain as long as the page structure there is consistent. I'd like to withdraw this. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Balch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Balch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Citation template used in just one article. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite IFSG Impact DB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite IFSG Impact DB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Somewhat intricate template that is just cite web with some parameters pre-filled out. Only on two articles and seems to add confusion to editors rather than simplify things. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacing. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AHSCharacter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AHSCharacter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Note: I somehow deleted my own rationale but this serves no purpose and we should just link directly to redirects. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

what, no rationale? however, I agree we should delete after replacing per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to speed this discussion up? Koavf Frietjes I don't mind if it's deleted or not, I don't really have an opinion on it. But see American Horror Story: Freak Show, the entire article is covered in deletion notes. G loss 16:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Koavf: @Frietjes: Anyone? There's a few articles that look like messes right now.. G loss 14:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gloss: The best way to speed up the discussion is if the creator consents to deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well as I said, I don't have much of an opinion on this so I would rather let others decide. But I suppose there is no way to let the discussion continue without these pages looking like such a mess? G loss 06:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Gloss created this template and has now started using redirects to the List of American Horror Story characters, which is what should've been done in the first place or not at all. None of the characters, in time, will be notable enough to have an article, in my opinion, and this and the redirects just take up WikiSpace, which is burdened enough on busy visitor days. — Wylie pedia 19:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be fine with deletion if ya'll are willing to help me out making the redirects. G loss 20:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.