Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 9
June 9
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ∯WBGconverse 04:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Momoland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The EP link is a redirect and the only other links are to the group's record labels and a show that one member of the group was on. They have one notable single ("Bboom Bboom") that could have an article but it's too soon for a template in my opinion. Random86 (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There is no need to have a navigational template if there is only one article in the template per WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Tagging it under the purview of speedy criterion G7 would have been more prudential:) (non-admin closure) ∯WBGconverse 04:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused template blanked with the rationale that it's inaccurate (apparently contains post-Reformation, not pre-Reformation Archbishops). ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 14:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Agree Bashereyre (talk) 18:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Will re-do as Post Reformation Roman Catholic Archbishops of Tuam, which is what it is
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 June 17. (non-admin closure) ∯WBGconverse 04:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Shooting at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Created to be used on one page, thus making this template unnecessary. Content can be merged with the article in question: Shooting at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- merge with article and then delete. Frietjes (talk) 14:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).