Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless template that is probably harder to use and remember than just typing 'Tuscany', and will just confuse anyone coming across it in Wikitext. Not that they will – it has been hardly used in the seven years since it was created.

I encountered it causing an error inside another template at Pisa Cathedral and had to take a look as to what its purpose was. Having removed it from that one it now only appears in one other article and could be simply replaced in that. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 22:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Food preparation; no opposition. Primefac (talk) 23:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cutting techniques (cooking) with Template:Food preparation.
Cutting is a food preparation technique. There is no need to have a separate, redundant template when we could just place this within the food prep template. ♠PMC(talk) 17:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates an insufficient number of pages. Izno (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mass of redlinks - does not navigate anywhere. PRehse (talk) 12:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 07:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 June 29. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).